Minutes from March 17, 2016

The Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District

Regular Meeting

March 17, 2016

6:30 PM

Lake Delhi Trustees Building

Delhi, IA

 

The regular meeting of the Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District was called to order by President Steve Leonard at 6:32 PM.

Trustees present: Leonard, Kramer, Colgan, Gifford, Burger

Trustees absent: Davidson, Herman

Visitors: Marilyn Cook, Tom Cook, Larry Peter, Eve Peter, Pat Dede, Don Dede, Gordon Anderson, Pat Anderson, Chloe Colgan, Nancy Hurt, Dan Recker, Wayne Garvin, Jenny Garvin, Marcheta Cooey-Lux, Bill Lux

Motion to approve the agenda as posted made by Colgan, seconded by Gifford. Motion carried.

Motion to approve the minutes from February 18, 2016 and March 3, 2016 was made by Colgan, seconded by Burger.   Motion carried.

Kramer presented payments for approval. Payments in the amount of $2,436.79 for electricity, printer usage, lobbyist, publication expense, and internet were presented from the General Fund. Payments in the amount of $280,551.06 for dam operations, Phase 2 payment, and engineering services were presented from the Dam/Spillway Project Fund. Motion to approve payments as read was made by Colgan, seconded by Burger. Motion carried.

Kramer read the financial reports through February 29, 2016. The General Fund had revenues of $5,969.54 from the county and interest, and expenditures of $2,577.20. Ending balance for the General Fund was $259,061.52. The Debt Service Fund had revenues of $13,615.98 from the county and interest, and no expenditures, ending February at $193,909.22. The Dam/Spillway Project Fund had revenues of $302,018.95 from county and interest, and expenditures of $423,728.79 for Phase 2, engineering, and contracted services, ending December at

$3,348,961.00.   Motion to receive and file the financial reports made by Burger, seconded by Colgan. Motion carried.

Motion to request reimbursement in the amount of $88,111.23 from Delaware County made by Colgan, seconded by Gifford. Kramer noted that this is the final request for reimbursement from the county for the $2,999,999 that was approved for the dam spillway project.   Motion carried.

Colgan shared with the Trustees that Burrington’s proposed contract amendment defines the needs we will have based on the water flows of the lake. By working with Burrington Group we avoid expenses like payroll tax and workmans’ compensation. Jason Wenger noted there had been discussions of what is classified as an “independent contractor”. Based on conversations with others, it was determined that an independent contractor probably would not apply to someone who is scheduled on a regular basis. Burrington Group is willing to take the administrator role which includes payroll and insurance for those employees that will be doing the observations during specific flow rates as outlined in the amended contract. He also noted that these employee positions will not require heavy maintenance.   Any type of work beyond the scope of the checklist for these employees would go to an experienced contract such as Lunda. Wenger explained that in all probability a high percentage of the work on the dam will be done by volunteers who will be trained to do the daily visits. Burrington Group, under the terms of the original agreement, will be keeping a calendar to make sure there are people to cover the daily needs. If a volunteer in not available, the backup would be one of the paid employees. Colgan noted that he has a least a dozen individuals who have interest in volunteering their time with the daily inspections. He noted that this contract is for a two year period in which time the District will learn more of what their needs are and can make changes accordingly. Burger asked if the list of volunteers will be expanded in the future. Wenger said that is correct and that the expectation is that every volunteer go through a safety inspection training program. Colgan mentioned that the DNR has programs for training. Burger asked if the Board would be kept aware of any additional volunteers that are added. Wenger replied that any new volunteers would have to be approved by Burrington Group and the Trustees.

A motion to approve the proposed contract amendment with Burrington Group was made by Gifford, second by Burger. The motion was to approve Burrington hiring dam operators, adding their costs and submitting invoices to cover paid operators costs. Motion carried.

A request from the Turtle Creek Road Association for lakebed improvements was read by Kramer. The work was done in August, 2015 after their proposal was approved by the Trustees. The pay request was delayed until this time per a request from the contractor that did the work. Kramer read the request form the Turtle Creek Road Association. The amount of the request was $19,321.00 which was the amount charged by the contractor to do the work. She noted that that an additional item was added to the original proposal and that was for a culvert that was determined to be necessary during the course of the project. The request is for 80% of the completed project. Gifford asked what the amount of the original project was. Kramer said she thought around $18,700 but wasn’t sure as she didn’t have a copy of that proposal. After reviewing the minutes from that board meeting where the original proposal was approved, it was determined that the original proposal was for $18,680. Colgan expressed an interest in seeing the exact area and knowing the amount of what was taken out. Gifford said Bill Havertape has that information and that the area is documented. A motion was made by Kramer, second by Colgan to pay Turtle Creek Road Association request for reimbursement. After some discussion there was a request to revise the motion by Gifford, second by Burger to approve 80% of the original contract or $14,944. Motion carried.

The Board considered the donation request from the LDRA for the dredge debt. The LDRA requested $48,553.50 for the principal interest for the Bank Iowa loan due June 1st. Burger motioned to approve the donation to the LDRA, Colgan seconded. Motion carried.

Consideration for action on the final agreement with the Rocky Nook Association for septic/water lines was presented by Leonard. He explained that in order to rebuild the dam and spillway it was necessary for the District to negotiate an agreement with the Rocky Nook Association to purchase the necessary property needed for the spillway. The agreement included payment for the land plus a new water/septic system. Jason Wenger from Burrington Group, who supervised the water/septic project said that the area had historically had problems but now that the work is complete he had Dennis Lyons from the County Sanitation Department inspect and he was satisfied with the work that was done. Leonard reminded the trustees that we have already paid Roger Groth for part of the work that was completed. The District is now being presented with his final two pay requests in the amount of $24,038.38. Wenger advised that the completed project by Groth came in under bid by $13,500. An additional component of the project was the electrical work needed for the pumps to operate. That work was done by Pfeiler and included a new service panel. The work is complete and they are asking for payment of $1,655.   Leonard stated that there is still a couple of areas yet to be completed. The first is a reimbursable invoice from Groth for the remaining hookups in the amount of $22,760 that will be paid once the Rocky Nook Association meets code. The second is that there are still 3-5 tanks that need to be pumped and filled in. The Rocky Nook Association will also be required to sign off on the project before that final payment is made.   Motion by Gifford, second by Kramer to pay Groth and Pfeiler for the invoices presented. Motion carried.

Gifford gave an update on the Lake Bed Cleanup. He noted that no projects have been planned at this time but because we will not be filling the lake in the next 30 days or so there’s work that could be done at North beach. Leonard reminded those in attendance that if they know of areas where there’s hazardous debris they should notify the trustees so we can address the issue.

Leonard gave an update on dredging. He said a lot of work has been done evaluating siltation traps. He has asked Bill Holman from Stanley Engineering to quantify the recommended siltation trap located near the Cedars. Some of the questions raised are: How much siltation can we stop? What information can we gather to understand our return on investment? What’s the cost if we do nothing? Will it cost more if we wait? Would the siltation trap help with water quality initiatives? Burger asked if there are companies that provide services to answer these questions. Leonard said he believes so and with Stanley’s help we will be able to locate them. Alternatives such as Iowa State University could assist. Leonard informed the board that the District should endorse a future plan in order to get any type of funding from the state, federal or other funding sources.

A dam construction update was presented by Colgan.   He told those in attendance that the D1 slab which is one of the two major horizontal concrete slabs supporting the labyrinth spillway was completed today. He estimated there were about 75 truckloads of concrete that was poured in a six hour time span. He noted the biggest frustration of getting to this point was that the dam was built on a glacial tilt and get the correct compaction of material during the months of January and February was very difficult. Now that the weather is starting to cooperate, General Constructors has been very active. Iron workers worked over the weekend to get all of the rebar in place so the pour could be done. Several other major pours will be done next week which will allow the spillway to be poured around the 2nd or 3rd week in April.   Once the spillway is completed there will still be work to do including removing the cofferdam, backfill work, removing the sheet pile and the earthen dike. He noted that the average flow for this time of year is 400 cfs. Right now it’s 700 cfs. At the flow rate, the lake could be full in two days. A question was raised about debris coming down river once the lake fills. Colgan said debris in the river is a concern due to the lake being empty for almost six years and is somewhat on an unknown at this time but should be manageable. He noted that Lunda was down last week and set up the stop logs. Steve Gehl, who was the Phase 1 construction superintendent from Lunda, said this stop log system is the smoothest he’s ever seen in his experience.

Leonard gave an update regarding water quality. He said he’s been proactively working with the Maquoketa River Watershed Authority, the state legislature and our lobbyists to get a law approved by the Iowa House and Senate that would allow Lake Delhi to be voting member and give us opportunities in the future for state and federal funding. Our lobbyists play an important role in this endeavor and will continue to assist with funding for water quality and siltation programs. There are currently only seven watersheds in the state and by taking the lead now we are years ahead of others before formed. Gifford said this is a hot topic in the State and watersheds will carry a lot of weight to get in getting funding dollars. Gifford also mentioned that he submitted a grant from the Green Community through Rockwell Collins that could potentially cover water-testing expenses.

Leonard informed those in attendance that the next Lake Delhi Voice will be coming out this weekend. He reminded everyone that the next month or so will be your last opportunity to do shore wall work and debris removal. All lake residents need to get their permits for docks and lifts along with making sure their septic systems have been permitted.

Leonard expressed thanks to the board for the plant that was sent to his family at the time of his mother-in-law’s death. He said it was greatly appreciated.

There being no public comments, a motion was made by Burger, second by Gifford to adjourn.

 

Minutes from March 3, 2016

The Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District

Board of Trustees Meeting

Thursday, March 3, 2016 – 6:30 p.m.

Lake Delhi Trustees Administration Office

The meeting of the Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District Board of Trustees was called to order by President Steve Leonard at 6:30 PM at Lake Delhi Trustees Administration Office.

Trustees present: Kramer, Davidson, Leonard by phone, Burger by phone

Trustees absent: Colgan, Gifford, Herman

Visitors: Larry Aschenbrenner, Nancy Hurt, Wanda Davidson

Agenda reviewed by Leonard. Motion was made to approve agenda by Davidson, second by Kramer. Motion carried.

The public hearing for the FY 2016/2017 budget was opened. Kramer gave a short overview of the proposed budget noting that our taxable valuation increased by $11,287,112 from last year. Kramer stated that due to the increased valuation, the tax rate for the lake debt service for FY will decrease from $9.10329 to $7.4775. It was also noted that property tax levied from the $4.00/$1000 will increase from $207,926 for FY16 to $253,065 for FY17 due to the increased valuation. With regard to estimated revenues and expenditures, Kramer stated that as the dam project nears completion we will see a drop in our ending balance in FY17. It was also noted that those numbers are estimates.

Kramer asked for any comments from the board or public. Davidson asked a question regarding the LDRA dredge loan. He wondered why the numbers went from $89,455 in FY15 to $72,107 in FY16 and then back up to $81,292 for FY17. Kramer answered that those numbers came from the dredge debt schedule which had been renegotiated in FYY16. Burger said he reviewed the budget and thought it looked good. Kramer noted that the last two pages of the budget were for the District’s debt service schedule. Those numbers are actual numbers and not estimates. Burger noted that the line item expenditures are estimates and the District could over-expend in one area and under-expend in another. What we can’t do is over-expend the total expenditures without amending the budget. Leonard asked for a motion to close the public hearing. Davidson made the motion, Burger second. Motion catrried.

Burger made motion to adopt a resolution to approve the Fiscal Year budget for 2016/2017, Davidson second. Motion carried.

The next agenda item was consideration and possible action on amending the District’s credit card policy. Kramer explained that the policy had been approved at the February meeting but after giving it to Carla Becker, the County Auditor, she felt we needed to change some of the language. Her concern was the language that gave some leeway to purchases made that would allow for payment of sales tax. She suggested removing that language and adding language that if a purchase was made that included sales tax, the Board of Trustees would need to review and approve before payment could be made. Kramer noted that she had had discussions with Burger and Davidson regarding other aspects of the policy but for the sake of getting the credit card application processed in a timely manner she would like a motion to approved the policy as amended. If we need to add or remove individuals currently named on the credit card policy, we can always amend at a later date. Kramer noted that Davidson felt we should use a purchase order system that isn’t addressed in the policy. Kramer said she agreed that we should look at that but also stressed that the credit card is going to be used minimally and that it was needed most to allow Burrington Group to make purchases for items not available locally that will be used for the start-up and maintenance of the dam. Kramer stated that in order to get the credit card application processed it needed to through the County Supervisors. Davidson asked why that was necessary. Kramer explained that because our finances are held by the County, any credit card application would require their approval. Motion was made by Burger, second by Davidson to approve the amended policy and open for further discussion. Burger said he wanted to make sure that since an important part of the credit card is to buy supplies & equipment for the dam we should have the ability to expand the number of credit card holders to Pat Colgan or those who may either work or volunteer at the dam at a later date. He also said we need to make sure we have control over the credit cards and that is the responsibility of the Treasurer. He said he would support approving the amended policy at this time but we should review to make sure we the right people approved to carry the card and would like to review the policy again at another time. Leonard said he agreed that this policy would probably always need to be looked at and reviewed as our needs continue to evolve but that we do need to get the application processed. Davidson commented that there should be a purchase order for anything ordered using the credit card and that it should be attached with the invoice when it’s presented for approval. With no further discussion, Leonard asked for a vote. Motion carried.

Leonard opened the meeting to public comment. Larry Aschbrenner noted that Sunday, March 13th would the the 4th Annual St. Patty’s Day Guest Bartender Event at the Pizza Place. He said he hoped to see as many people from the lake attend and asked that the Trustees send out an email to make people aware that the event was coming up. All tips go to the rebuilding of the dam. The Trustees thanked Larry for his continued support of the Lake.

Motion to adjourn by Davidson, second by Kramer. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:10 pm.

Minutes from February 18, 2016

The Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District

Regular Meeting

February 18, 2016

6:30 PM

Lake Delhi Trustees Building

Delhi, IA

 

The regular meeting of the Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District was called to order by President Steve Leonard at 6:28 PM.

Trustees present: Leonard, Kramer, Davidson, Herman, Colgan (Skype), Gifford (phone), Burger (phone)

Trustees absent: None

Visitors: Larry Peter, Eve Peter, Ed Schmidt, Dan Recker, Pat Dede, Don Dede, Chris Stender, Ron Cook, Marcheta Cooey-Lux, Bill Lux, Nancy Hurt, Dan Reyner, Wayne Garvin, Jenny Garvin, Larry Aschbrenner, Bruce Schneider, Margie Schneider

Recording Secretary: Shelley Kallenbach

Herman motioned to approve the agenda as posted and read, seconded by Davidson. Gifford motioned to move Agenda Item 11 to earlier in the meeting to accommodate his schedule. Herman modified his motion to approve the agenda with Agenda Item 11 to the fourth slot and move the remaining agenda items down accordingly, Davidson seconded, Motion approved.

Davidson motioned to approve the January 21, 2016 meeting minutes, Herman seconded, motion approved.

Davidson motioned to reopen the tabled motion regarding Bruce Schneider’s request for reimbursement for sediment removal from the lakebed, Burger seconded.

Individual trustee opinions regarding the motion were heard.

Davidson stated that he has had the opportunity to look at the sites and documentation. He says that ideally this work would have been approached in a different manner, but the sediment removal was still beneficial to everyone on the lake.

Burger seconded Davidson’s opinion and added that sediment removal improves the safety and recreational value of the lake.

Schneider stated that since the last meeting, he has removed another 50 dump truck loads for about another $3,000 worth of work. Most of the work had been done through the summer and fall and he plans on doing more.

Gifford stated that he did not consider whether or not the work done had value, as there was clear value, but that as the project was begun without trustee involvement it didn’t qualify for review. He stated the only portion that would qualify for reimbursement review would be future work that the Trustees would be involved in.

Herman stated that since the last meeting work has been done with definite value to the general boating and recreational value of the lake. He stated he shared Gifford’s concerns, and also has had lake residents contact him that are concerned about opening a “can of worms” regarding reimbursement. He is concerned that there was no prior Board approval and no solid way to measure what work had been done.

Colgan stated that he didn’t doubt there was value to the work completed, but had concerns about the reimbursement. He stated that if this was approved, many more would come forward. He believes there are still 6 to 12 weeks left to finish the dam and money may be required for contingencies. He feels he needs to be accountable for funding to be available if things happen in the future.

Leonard stated that the original intention with the 80%/20% match was to have Board involvement upfront evaluating ideas on criteria including public recreational benefit, improvement to safety, and cost effectiveness. He stated that it is difficult to understand the starting point and current point since the Board was not formally involved in the process from the beginning. He commended the Schneider family for their work. However, there’s no way to know if the work fits the Board’s criteria. He also commended all of the many property owners who have removed dirt with no reimbursement from the Lake District after the DNR/Corp of Engineers/County Engineer approval process. He stated he would strongly support future work based on recreational value, safety, and cost effectiveness, and would evaluate the work with the same heavy debate the other larger projects have received.

Clarification was requested regarding Colgan’s comments on funding. Colgan stated he is concerned about risk and the Board’s criteria for budget control for reimbursement when the dam itself is not finished.

The original motion on the table was for $25,000 reimbursement for Schneiders’ work that had already been done and still has yet to be done. Votes were taken as follows:

Burger: Yes

Gifford: No

Herman: No

Davidson: Yes

Leonard: No

Kramer: Abstain

Colgan: No

Motion does not pass.

Kramer presented payments for approval. Payments in the amount of $2,577.00 from the General Fund for electricity, internet, printer maintenance, lobbyist, and miscellaneous equipment were presented. Payments in the amount of $423,728.79 for Burrington Group, GCI payment, and Stanley engineering services were presented. Herman motioned to approve the payments as read, seconded by Kramer. Concerns about the increasing costs of engineering expenses were expressed. Colgan reviewed the four Stanley Engineering invoices for the month and their appropriateness. Leonard stated that as the project nears completion, Stanley’s engagement is critical with a lot of moving parts coming together with problem solving and advice. Leonard expressed confidence in the services received and the amount billed. Additionally, a question about whether GCI should pick up some of the contract extension bills due to their failure to meet the deadline in the contract. It was confirmed that over 2 million dollars was saved from the contract rebid, and even with additional charges, there is still a major net money difference saved. Motion passed.

Gifford dropped from the meeting.

Kramer presented the financial reports. The General Fund had revenues of $943.64 and expenses of $2,502.06 to end January at $255,669.18. The Debt Service Fund had revenues of $2,156.24 and no expenditures, ending January at $180,293.24. The Dam/Spillway Project Fund had revenues of $439,076.17 from reimbursements and the county, and expenditures of $660,463.50, ending January at #3,470,670.84. Davidson motioned to file the financial reports as read, seconded by Herman, motion approved.

Motion to request reimbursement from Delaware County in the amount of $194,601.27 for expenses paid by the District was made by Herman, seconded Davidson, motion approved.

Discussion was opened on the issue of a credit card for the District. A maximum spending limit has been set by the County at $3,000. The credit card application would be processed through Grundy National Bank. A set of procedures on the use of this credit card was presented. Herman motioned to approve the presented procedures, Davidson seconded. Discussion was opened. Herman added an exception for smaller online purchases in which the tax-exempt paperwork would take more time than it is worth. Stamped inventory and a purchasing log was also discussed. Herman amended his motion to allow purchases of less than $50 total online be exempt from the tax-exempt status if it creates a hardship in regards to placing an order, Davidson seconded, motion approved.

Colgan reviewed GCI Change Order #8 in the amount of $6,683.25. This was presented at the previous meeting but had not yet been adequately reviewed by Stanley Engineering. This change order allows for equipment that would allow the SCADA computer to be located in the LDRA house across the river which has better environment to house this type of equipment computer to the dampness of the concrete powerhouse structure. Burger motioned to approve GCI Change Order #8, Kramer seconded, motion approved.

Colgan presented updates regarding job descriptions for potential future employees of the lake. Colgan states that the District will not be hiring any contractors as direct employees to operate the dam. Personal that will operate the dam that are non-volunteer workers would be hired and managed by Burrington Group. All maintenance work would be a separate contract with Lunda for one to two years.

The potential endorsement of HF2249 by the District was discussed. Leonard stated that a very concerted approach was made regarding getting financial support for Lake Delhi and future watershed management concerns. As this is a growing statewide issue, increased funding is becoming available through the state. However, Iowa requires that only counties and cities are able to be voting members of watershed management authorities.  Our combined District is currently not eligible. HF2249 is a bill currently in place to allow the District to be a voting member of this future watershed management authority. The bill has already passed the committee process. Davidson motioned to formally endorse HF2249 as a District, Kramer seconded. It is unknown at this time what liabilities the District may incur in the future as part of this authority, but each will be reviewed extensively. Motion to endorse HF2249 approved.

The Board heard committee updates.

The Lake Bed Cleanup Committee had no updates.

The Dredge Committee should know the final Lidar mapping from Stanley on the last remaining borings and will forward the data as soon as it is received.

The Dam Construction Committee states that GCI has worked every day except for three or four due to wind chill. Six to eight weeks remain to finish the dam under ideal weather conditions, with parts remaining including a sheet pile wall to prevent water from running around the dam spillway. The downstream side is complete. The weather has been impacting the compaction of clay materials that will be the base for three remaining concrete slabs on grade. Warmer weather, wind, and potentially mixing the clay with lime will allow for drier clay and subsequent slab placement.

The Funding and Finance Committee stated there will be a public hearing March 3rd to review the next fiscal year budget.

Leonard added that within the last week he met with the Iowa DNR and various state representatives in Des Moines for an update on the lake restoration progress and the request to get on the Iowa Public Lakes list. This could allow for increased funding for the lake. There was good communication and support following the meeting.

Public discussion was opened.

Bruce Schneider stated that he feels he was let down by the Board because he was not told to get a bid. Leonard clarified that there were no details on the work done or the estimated cost until the last meeting. Leonard stated that the Board had taken the time to evaluate the cost effectiveness, safety, and risk management of each project proposal on its individual merits, and would continue to do so for any future work, including work performed by Schneider. He stated that with all proposals, the Board had gone through a yes or no process of voting for each project individually. Leonard stated that he is willing to add future work with the Schneiders on the March 3rd meeting agenda if the Schneiders are willing to propose new work. Assuming the board is in agreement with new work, he would contact Randy Rattenborg to come out to complete laser lines for work estimation prior to the work starting.

Larry Peter expressed concerns about matching funds required in a watershed authority regarding property tax increases. It was clarified that any situation where matching funds would require a property tax increase would have to go to the voters. If the general operating funds would be used for matching funding, the Board would make the decision to use or not use it.

A question was raised on if the District would be paying rent to the LDRA for use of the LDRA building for the remote computer access. It was clarified that the District owns the LDRA building.

It was clarified that no liaison is required to be a part of the legislative watershed authority, as the request is for the Board to have a single vote.

A question regarding the location of archaeological sites was raised. It was confirmed that the Board is unaware of any archaeological disturbances, but is bound by the Corps of Engineers not to release the archaeological site locations publicly. However, the Board continues to be mindful of them.

With regard to the 80%/20% projects, it was confirmed that each project had been done differently for silt removal along with being reviewed by the Board under its own individual merits. 100% payment by the road associations had been expected prior to Board reimbursement. A laser requirement will be reviewed on March 3rd as a formal process. Schneider’s future work would be considered but not automatically approved.

Davidson motioned to adjourn, seconded by Herman. Meeting adjourned at 8:25 PM.

Minutes from January 21, 2016

The Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District

Regular Meeting

Thursday, January 21, 2016

6:30 PM

Lake Delhi Trustees Administration Building

Delhi, IA

The regular meeting of the Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District was called to order by President Steve Leonard at 6:30 pm.

Trustees present: Leonard, Gifford, Burger, Kramer, Davidson, Herman, Colgan (via Skype)

Trustees absent: None

Recording secretary: Shelley Kallenbach

Visitors: Larry Peter, Eve Peter, Donald Dede, Becky Willey, Jim Willey, Ed Schmidt, Margie Schneider, Bruce Schneider, Randy Rattenborg, Jason Wenger, Dave Larson, Ben Pasker, Bill Lux, Marcheta Lux

Motion to approve the agenda as posted made by Davidson, seconded by Burger, motion approved.

Motion to approve the December 17, 2015 meeting minutes made by Burger, seconded by Gifford, motion approved.

Kramer presented payments for approval. Payments in the amount of $2,672.26 for electricity, printer maintenance, warrants, lobbyist, salt and sand, and internet were presented from the General Fund. Payments in the amount of $660,463.50

for dam operations, Phase 2 and Phase 1 payments, and engineering services were presented from the Dam/Spillway Project Fund. Motion to approve payments as read was made by Burger, seconded by Gifford, motion approved.

Kramer read the financial reports through December 31, 2015. The General Fund had revenues of $4,814.86 from the county and interest, and expenditures of $3,568.38 from approved miscellaneous payments, ending December at $257,397.70. The Debt Service Fund had revenues of $6,539.62 from the county and interest, and no expenditures, ending December at $178,137.00. The Dam/Spillway Project Fund had revenues of $1,245,412.59 from county, community fund, and LDRA revenues, and expenditures of $445,412.45 for Phase 2, engineering, and contracted services, ending December at $3,692,058.17. Motion to receive and file the financial reports made by Burger, seconded by Herman, motion approved.

Motion to request reimbursement in the amount of $299,681.95 from Delaware County made by Herman, seconded by Gifford, motion approved.

Motion to request reimbursement in the amount of $350,530.55 from the Community Fund to Rebuild Lake Delhi made by Davidson, seconded by Gifford. The Community Fund will have approximately $60,000 left in it after this requested draw. Motion approved.

Motion to approve Thursday, March 3rd at the Administrative Building at 6:30 PM for a public hearing to approve the FY 2016/2017 budget was made by Burger, seconded by Gifford, motion approved.

The Board considered possible action on a proposal from Dubuque Fire Equipment for equipment needed for dam operations. Dubuque Fire Equipment was recommended to assist with finding necessary fire protection equipment for the dam. A walkthrough was conducted, and DFE provided an itemization of what is needed and pricing. Their recommendation for equipment came to a cost of $2,614.00. Colgan advised that he believed this was an appropriate recommendation. Motion to approve the proposal from DFE as read made by Herman, seconded by Burger. The proposal does not include regular maintenance, which is a nominal fee. Motion approved.

Motion to table discussion on a possible credit card for operational purposes until an example policy can be obtained made by Burger, seconded by Gifford, motion approved.

Change Order #7 was canceled. Colgan presented GCI Change Order #8. which is the equipment required to allow the SCADA computer to be installed in the LDRA building across the river from the concrete powerhouse. The control room where the computer was to be placed has environmental problems including high humidity. An alternative location was recommended to eliminate the need to make major modifications to the control room to improve the environment. Part of the benefit of the SCADA system is to allow JetCo to remotely reprogramming of the PLC. Change Order #8 is for the purchase and placement of this equipment to allow the SCADA computer to be located across the river in the LDRA building. Kramer motioned to table discussion on Change Order #8 until further information is obtained, seconded by Herman, motion approved.

The Board discussed the need for a job description for paid contractors and dam volunteers. The operating plan has the dam operations automated 85% of the time with daily inspections made by volunteers. However, for the other 15%, trained operators would be needed during gate movement, etc. This group of people would also be responsible for upkeep, maintenance, buoys, etc. A meeting with Burrington Group is scheduled to discuss this subject. Motion to table discussion on a job description made by Burger, seconded by Davidson. It was emphasized that it is important to clarify the job responsibilities of a contractor versus an employee for legal purposes. Motion to table approved.

The Board heard Bruce Schneider’s proposal for reimbursement for sediment removal from the lakebed. Schneider presented a letter detailing his proposal. His first proposal had been for an 80% cost share for $25,680 for the 6,420 cubic yards of material he has removed since 2014. Since this proposal was made in October of 2015, he has removed an additional 2,938 cubic yards of sediment at an estimated cost of $14,700. He proposes a reimbursement of $25,000, with the remainder and any further work donated by himself, to cover fuel and machinery costs.

Burger motioned to approve a $25,000 reimbursement to Schneider for this and future dredging, seconded by Davidson.

Discussion was opened on the proposal. The sediment location removal was originally driven by the search for black dirt for the Schneider family farm, and it removed approximately 75 to 100 feet out toward the lakebed to create about 6 feet deep of water near Schmidt’s cove. Concerns about the recreational value of this dredging were raised. The benefit of sediment removal for future dredging requirements was reiterated. Concerns about opening up reimbursements for dredging work completed in 2014 or earlier by private individuals was raised, as well as concerns about reimbursement for work that may or may not happen. The original state of dredging with the October proposal was visited and seen by Leonard, Herman, and Davidson, but the additional work has not been seen.

A roll call of concerns to be addressed prior to approval was made.

Leonard commented that he appreciated Bruce removing dirt and silt from the Lake for the potential benefit of many.   He stated he wanted to look at the updated work prior to making a recommendation, as well as the goals and plans for going forward. He stated that he wished they had brought a plan to the board before doing any work as it is difficult to understand what specific benefits there is to this proposed reimbursement project. Reminding everyone that safety, public recreational benefit, and cost effectiveness needs to be considered and the only way to do that was to have the board involved since inception. He wants to do his due diligence to see the benefits to the lake prior committing anything to be fiscally responsible to taxpayers.

The Schneiders’ commented that they don’t expect to keep working for free without having an agreement in place to get paid.   Leonard said that anything going forward should be agreed to by the District board with all appropriate District criteria considered if reimbursement is to be requested.

Colgan says there is a benefit to the sediment removal and the amount requested is fair, but wants to see more detail prior to approval.

Kramer agreed with Colgan that removal of sediment is a benefit to the lake but expressed concern that there was no Trustee oversight on this project.

Gifford explained that he is having difficulty determining what the value of what Schneider did because he does not know the before and after depths, or dimensions of the area where sediment was removed.

Gifford wants to know how deep it was in this location prior to sediment removal, and how deep it is now.  He also asked if any sand was removed besides the black direct.  Schneider responded that he didn’t take the sand because it had no value.

Gifford then asked Schneider if his project was profitable and beneficial, explaining he is assuming it was or why would Schneider proceed with it.  Schneider responded that it was profitable and beneficial to him.

“Herman indicated a desire to be able to explain, in detail, to anyone that asked the reasons that the Board approved a cost share on any given project.  In order to do so, Herman wanted to have a quantification of material to be removed or that has been removed, especially if the Board were to consider the approval of a prior removal from 2014.  Herman also indicated that the use of prior and subsequent LIDAR data would be beneficial.”

Motion to table the motion made by Burger was made by Herman to allow board members to take a closer look, seconded by Gifford. Votes tabled as follows:

Leonard: Yay

Gifford: Yay

Kramer: Yay

Herman: Yay

Burger: Nay, because he feels it is time to approve this particular request.

Davidson: Nay, because he feels that this is an incredible deal.

Motion approved; discussion on a possible Schneider reimbursement tabled until the February meeting.

The Board heard committee updates.

The Lake Bed Cleanup Committee had no updates.

The Dredge Committee will be having a work session soon to work on the going-forward strategy for dredging and a vision for sediment maintenance.

The Dam Construction Committee says that GCI has stuck with it every day in January that work was possible. Next week work will be to construct one of the inclined slabs on grade and will include placing the granular fill, installing rebar, and concrete pouring on Thursday or Friday of next week. He applauds GCI for working through tough situations and not asking for additional funds.

The Water Quality Committee is tackling many water quality issues and also pursuing a Rockwell grant. Work on these water quality issue will be discussed at the upcoming planning meeting.

The Funding/Finance Committee had no updates. Burger complimented Kramer on her solid work on the presented budget.

Herman updated the Board that he has received a petition for a declaratory judgment as discussed in previous meetings and is working on filling in the blanks. He is also working on a FEMA quarterly report.

There was no public comment.

Davidson motioned to adjourn, seconded by Gifford. The meeting adjourned at 8:21 pm.

Minutes from 12.17.15

The Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District Board of Trustees

Regular Meeting

Thursday, December 17, 2015

6:30 PM

Lake Delhi Administration Building

Delhi, IA

The regular meeting of the Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District Board of Trustees was called to order by President Steve Leonard at 6:35 PM.

 

Trustees present: Leonard, Gifford, Burger, Kramer, Herman, Colgan, and Davidson (arrived later)

Trustees absent: None

Recording secretary: Shelley Kallenbach

Visitors present: Larry Peter, Eve Peter, Pat Dede, Don Dede, Sara Millhouse, Dave Larson, Chloe Colgan, Brock Lorren, Chip Hughs, Jim Locke, Ben Pasker, Randy Rattenborg, Larry Aschbrenner, Marcheta Cooey-Lux

 

Motion to approve the agenda as read with the addition of consideration and possible action on GCI Change Order #2 was made by Colgan, seconded by Gifford, motion approved.

 

Motion to approve the November 19, 2015 meeting minutes as posted made by Burger, seconded by Herman, motion approved.

 

Kramer presented payments for approval. Claims in the amount of $3,090.97 from the General Fund for electricity, maintenance, clerical services, lobbyist services, printer cartridges, and furnace inspection were presented. Claims in the amount of $445,889.76 for powerhouse painting, dam operations, Phase 2 payment, engineering services, and diesel fuel were made from the Dam/Spillway Project Fund. Motion to approve payments as read was made by Herman, seconded by Gifford, motion approved.

 

Motion to approve a request to Delaware County for reimbursement for invoices paid by the District for the spillway rebuild in the amount of $218,267.27 was made by Herman, seconded by Burger, motion approved.

 

Motion to approve a request to the Community Fund to Rebuild Lake Delhi for reimbursement for invoices paid by the District for the dam rebuild in the amount of $218,738.43 was made by Burger, seconded by Gifford, motion approved.

 

Kramer presented the financial reports. The General Fund had revenues of $4,186.43 from Delaware County, and expenditures of $2,506.13 for miscellaneous expenses, ending the month at $256,151.22. The Debt Service Fund had revenues of $9,575.53 from Delaware County and expenditures of $115,323.75 for an interest payment, ending the month at $171,597.38. The Dam/Spillway Project Fund had revenues of $2,504.12 from interest and expenditures of $533,654.10 for Phase 1, Phase 2, and engineering payments, ending the month at $2,892,058.03.

 

Leonard and Kramer presented a high-level projected budget summary for the dam reconstruction. The projected budget estimates the total cost, including all planned and foreseen costs, at approximately $15,861,393, and total funding for the project estimated at $16,451,400.10. Therefore, barring significant additional unforeseen expenditures, the dam should be rebuilt with an excess of funding of approximately $590,007.10 remaining.

 

Motion to file the financial reports and projected budget summary as presented was made by Colgan, seconded by Herman, motion approved.

 

The Board considered possible action on Stanley Supplemental Agreement #34. This supplemental agreement had been made months ago for Stanley to evaluate dredging and siltation trap options in the amount of $17,100. However, formal approval of the supplemental agreement was not made, though the work is complete and paid for. Motion to formally approve Stanley Supplemental Agreement #34 was made by Herman, seconded by Kramer, motion approved.

 

The Board considered possible action on Stanley Supplemental Agreement #39 in the amount of $90,000. This is to extend the time for the Stanley contractor to work on site to monitor day-to-day operations and answer technical questions, as well as office work and Stanley negotiation with contractors regarding change orders. The extension would be through February 1st, 2016, and is necessary due to the construction delay after the June cofferdam breach. Burger motioned to approve Stanley Supplemental Agreement #39, Kramer seconded. It was confirmed that the Board’s contract with GCI does not place this cost on GCI for delays attributed to them, though it was a major point of discussion in the rebid for Phase 2, but that this will be the only cost to the Board for the delay in comparison to GCI’s significant costs. Motion approved.

 

The Board considered possible action on GCI Change Orders #2 through #6.

 

GCI Change Order #2 is related to the decision to reuse the gate actuators in the current project. This presented a significant cost savings. However, the actuators’ electricity wiring needed to be updated to allow GCI to work with them. This updated change order is in the amount of $9,000. Herman motioned to approve, Burger seconded, motion approved.

 

GCI Change Order #3 is for work completed on the upstream buttress. As the wing wall was not on bedrock, the wing wall had to be sealed beneath the footing to prevent water from seeping into the upstream buttress. With Stanley’s negotiation, this change order is in the amount of $39,000. Kramer motioned to approve, Herman seconded, motion approved.

 

GCI Change Order #4 completed the same work as Change Order #3, only on the downstream buttress. With Stanley’s negotiation, Change Order #4 is in the amount of $9,000. Herman motioned to approve, Burger seconded, motion approved.

 

GCI Change Order #5 is in reference to work that was required following the June cofferdam failure. A clay core wall was required to be placed on the river floor to reinforce the cofferdam, which therefore doubled the amount of earthen material necessary to remove. This resulted in a unit price adjustment based on the amount of material removed, as well as testing for the new levels of clay that were not previously mapped by the 2011 borings. This change order is in the amount of $79,000, and the Board is contractually obligated to this cost. Herman motioned to approve Change Order #5, Kramer seconded, motion approved.

 

GCI Change Order #6 currently has no cost impact to the Board. Additional concrete costs are shared 50/50 between GCI and the Board up to the end of the year. The delay due to the June cofferdam breach has extended the timeframe for concrete pours. However, since the weather has so far been warm, there have been no additional costs to share. If there are costs before December 31st, those costs will be shared 50/50. Burger motioned to approve, Gifford seconded, motion approved.

 

The Board received and filed proposals for painting the powerhouse. The Board sought proposals for salt blast cleaning and repainting the powerhouse to allow for installation of cabinetry, electronics, etc. The Board received two bids, including one from Pospisil Painting for $27,410, and one from Allen’s Painting for $3,400. The Trustees have a resolution allowing the Board President and Treasurer to approve expenditures up to $5,000 before Board approval, and so the Allen Painting bid was selected and used. The powerhouse has now been saltblasted and painted. Burger motioned to receive and file the bids from Allen’s Painting and Pospisil Painting, and to approve the Allen’s Painting bid, Gifford seconded, motion approved.

 

The Board considered establishing credit accounts with Delhi Lumber, Palmer Hardware, and Norby’s Farm and Fleet for small purchases necessary for dam operations. A need was expressed for accounts to allow for purchases of miscellaneous items such as snowblowers, salt, etc. necessary for operators to use on the dam on short notice. Burger motioned to establish credit accounts with Delhi Lumber, Palmer Hardware, and Norby’s Farm and Fleet with a limit of up to $500 per purchase with a list of all authorized chargers and to require signoff for purchase from a trustee, Davidson seconded, motion approved.

 

The Board discussed the need to consider a credit card account for operational purposes. The Board may need to purchase larger items or items that cannot be found locally for dam operations, so a credit card would be useful. It was agreed that this would be a good idea and that options should be considered. Herman motioned to table action on a credit card until the January meeting, Burger seconded, motion approved.

 

The Board considered possible action on a small committee to investigate the transition of the Maquoketa River Water Quality Team’s mission and duties to the Board. Over recent years, the Maquoketa River Water Quality Team (MRWQT) has been overseeing water quality, including septic maintenance, erosion control, bacteria testing, and public information. The MRWQT is seeking to transfer these responsibilities over to the Board along with remaining funds earmarked to be used for encouraging people to maintain water quality. It was discussed that water quality is a very large issue with many subsections, and a small committee is needed to determine these subsections and begin the process of focusing and researching water quality for Board recommendations on an action plan. Disappointment on the loss of knowledgeable voices from the MRWQT was expressed. Herman motioned to create a small committee with not to exceed 3 trustees and not to exceed 3 volunteer members of the public if available to create recommendations and thoughts on how the Board should proceed from a water quality standpoint, Gifford seconded, motion approved. Interested trustee members were solicited. Leonard, Gifford, and Davidson expressed interest in participation.

 

The Board heard committee updates.

 

Leonard presented updates from the Water Quality committee. The Board was represented at meetings for a large Watershed Management Authority encompassing Maquoketa River stakeholders. The Board was instrumental in beginning this process. It is seeking an agreement between political subdivisions to assess water quality and flood risk, develop partnerships and leverage resources. 28 participants were present at the meeting, including counties, conservation departments, the NRCS, and others. They are seeking to draft a 28E agreement to commit to water quality importance, especially in light of recent legal actions taken in Des Moines against authorities for water quality-related complaints. More will be coming in the next month or two.

 

The Lake Bed Cleanup committee stated that a significant amount of debris was lost following heavy rains the past week. This was a big plus for the lake.

 

The Dredging Committee is seeking ways to stop siltation from getting downstream into the lake, and a great way to do that would be to have a siltation trap near the dredge disposal site as recommended by Stanley Engineering. The Committee has found a firm in Iowa to give an estimate for such a project at $1.8 to $2 million in a 20-acre area.  A final amount would be determined by the board going out to bid.  If this is deemed to be an important project by the board, we will need to continue to raise money.  Fund raising will be critical to the success of a sedimentation trap.

 

The Dam Construction Committee presented updates. A major flood occurred this past week, including 3 inches of rain last Sunday. The flow rose to 4200 cfs. The flood gates had been in a position to protect the downstream cofferdam, but with the rain, it became necessary to protect the entire site from flooding upstream. The contractors were given enough time to remove their equipment successfully downstream before the gates were opened to release the water. The downstream cofferdam was lost, but it would not have been needed within a week anyway. The workers were back to work by Tuesday working on the top portion of the dam. Only one day was lost. Remaining work includes 3 slabs on grade, 3 wall pours, and the labyrinth spillway.

 

The Funding/Finance Committee and Legislative Committee had no updates.

 

The floor was opened for public comment.

 

Confusion about change orders was expressed. It was explained that the original contract with GCI was for $6.1 million, and change orders cover changes to the contract due to site conditions. The plan and the costs will come out very close.

 

It was expressed that when considering dredge costs, the cost to remove material is often overlooked.

 

It was stated that in 13 days, the DNR goes to the appropriations committee to ask for watershed area funding, but Lake Delhi doesn’t qualify due to the ratios used to meet the criteria. It was asked how to change criteria to increase funding. The Board stated that this is not the sole determiner of yearly funding, and also that the creation of this watershed authority may impact funding opportunities in the future.

 

Burger motioned to adjourn, Herman seconded, meeting adjourned at 8:30 PM.

Minutes from 11/19/15

The Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District Board of Trustees

Regular Meeting

November 19, 2015

6:30 PM
Lake Delhi Trustees Administration Building

Delhi, IA

 

The regular meeting of the Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District Board of Trustees was called to order by Vice President Todd Gifford at 6:32 PM.

Trustees present: Gifford, Davidson, Burger, Colgan, Kramer, Herman, Leonard (by phone)

Trustees absent: None

Recording secretary: Shelley Kallenbach

Visitors present: Larry Peter, Eve Peter, Ed Schmidt, Jim Locke, Becky Willey, Jim Willey, Don Dede, Pat Dede

Motion to approve the posted agenda as read was made by Herman, seconded by Davidson, motion approved.

Motion to approve the October 15, 2015 and November 4, 2015 meeting minutes was made by Burger, seconded by Herman, motion approved.

Kramer presented payment claims for approval. From the General Fund, a total of $2,256.13 for electricity, lobbyist, and furnace inspection expenses was presented. From the Debt Service Fund, a total of $421,312.43 for payments to GCI and Stanley Consultants was presented. Herman motioned to approve the payments as read, Colgan seconded, motion approved.

Motion to approve a request to Delaware County for reimbursement for invoices paid by the District for the spillway rebuild in the amount of $208,137.59 made by Burger, seconded by Davidson, motion approved.

Motion to approve a request to the Community Fund to Rebuild Lake Delhi for reimbursement for invoices paid by the District for the dam rebuild in the amount of $188,796.70 was made by Colgan, seconded by Davidson. A rough estimate of the balance remaining in this fund was requested. It was estimated to have $700,000 remaining after this request. Motion approved.

Motion to approve a request to the Lake Delhi Recreation Association for reimbursement for invoices paid by the District for the dam rebuild in the amount of $22,967.14 was made by Colgan, seconded by Herman. It was confirmed that these are donations that were made after the breech designated for the dam rebuild, and it includes the full balance of the account. Motion approved.

Kramer read the financial reports. The General Fund had revenues of $14,326.63 from Delaware County and interest, and expenditures of $32,634.93 for LDRA donations, miscellaneous expenses already approved, and the Turtle Creek West/Linden Acres cost-share, ending October at $254,470.92. The Debt Service Fund had revenues of $32,601.22 from Delaware County and no expenditures, ending October at $277,345.60. The Dam/Spillway Project Fund had revenues of $1,059,239.66 from Delaware County, the DNR, and the Community Fund to Rebuild Lake Delhi, and expenditures of $1,281,901.03 for Phase 2 payments and engineering payments, ending October at $3,423,208.01. Burger motioned to file the financial reports as read, seconded by Herman. A rough estimate of the dam rebuild costs once finished was made at approximately 15.1 million, and a rough estimate of funds remaining after the rebuild was made at approximately $400,000. It was confirmed that a draft of a high-level summary of project cost totals and remaining balances has been made and a finished product will be available at the next meeting. Motion approved.

The Board considered possible action on filing a Declaratory Judgment action related to the dredge site. This has to do with the need to transfer the lake dredge site from the LDRA to the District as required by FEMA. The owner of the land has the right of first refusal in the event of a resale and desires to exercise this right regarding the transfer. It is the Board’s opinion that this transfer is not a resale, and negotiations to this effect with the owner have been unsuccessful. A Declaratory Judgment would be a civil action and the legal costs associated with it would depend on the owners’ response to it. However, the district stands to lose money from FEMA if this transfer does not occur, it is in the Districts best interest to pursue the issue. Herman motioned to hire the attorney that has assisted the District in the past to file a Declaratory Judgment that the owners’ right of first refusal does not apply to the transfer of the dredge site from the LDRA to the District, seconded by Colgan. It was confirmed that if the judge rules in favor of the owners, the District will not be responsible for the owners’ legal fees per Iowa law. It was stated that FEMA has been cooperative in waiting for a resolution to this situation, but as all attempts have been unsuccessful, it is necessary to issue this judgment to keep the process moving in the case. Motion approved.

The Board considered possible action on a matching request from Turtle Creek Cove.

Dan Reyner presented the Turtle Creek Cove project proposal. The proposal currently presented to the Board is a project that would dredge the cove to a depth of 8 feet, totaling an estimated 10,000 cubic yards of material at $6.50 per cubic yard, as well as create a sediment trap at the entrance to the Cove to prevent sediment from the creek from entering the lake. The seventeen property owners involved in this proposal are willing to contribute $1,200 each to the project as their 20% of the project and request the Board to match the project at 80%. The Cove also proposes that the Board take over maintenance of the sediment trap. Reducing the dredge to 6 feet would make the project costs approximately $60,000 as another landowner is willing to take much of the sand for an existing private project. It is the Cove’s opinion that the Cove should be considered a sediment trap, and the proposed project would present considerable sediment reduction and management for the entire lake.

Colgan motioned to enter into discussion regarding the proposal, Davidson seconded. Discussion was opened.

General thanks to the Turtle Creek Cove for the work to present this proposal and unify so many property owners. It was agreed that the Board was in favor of the sediment trap as it relates to preventing sediment from entering the lake, assuming appropriate easements and rights to reach the trap, as it would benefit all residents. The isolated cost of creating just the sediment trap was identified to be $25,000.

Leonard expressed the opinion that though some may consider this a private cove, the Board should support efforts at siltation control at a lower price than what would be possible after lake fill, which would save taxpayer funds in the future. Others expressed concerns about the dredging portion of the project beyond what is required for the siltation trap only as being an expense that does not benefit the entire lake. Others believed that in return for the Cove’s cooperation on building the sediment trap, the Board should also do something for the Cove itself. Reyner expressed the opinion that the Cove itself is a sediment trap for the entire lake in reference to a 50-year or 100-year weather event, and as such dredging of the Cove would benefit the entire lake. It was confirmed that the lake has been dredged in the past, and that dredging in 2005 included the coves.

Herman motioned that the District contribute a sum not to exceed $40,000 to the Turtle Creek Cove proposed project, paying for the sediment trap first, with the remaining balance to contribute to Cove dredging upon the conditions that the residents contribute $1,200 each and the necessary easements for the District to clean out the sediment traps as necessary, Davidson seconded.

Several board members disliked the percentage split for this motion at 33%. Herman believed that the percentages should be different because the project has greater benefits to the residents of the Cove than to the residents of the entire lake. Leonard stated he wanted to see an 80-20% cost share.

A vote was held regarding Herman’s motion. Votes were tallied as follows:

 

Colgan: No

Burger: Yes

Davidson: Yes

Herman: Yes

Gifford: Yes

Kramer: No

Leonard: No

Motion approved.

Reynar was asked his opinion regarding the residents’ willingness to accept this proposal. Reynar stated that the residents would not be interested in the project with these terms at a 33% cost share when the difference is $8,000.

Burger stated that other dredge projects at the 80-20% split added to the recreational and safety value of the lake, and he does not feel that is the case in the Cove.

Colgan motioned for a project total not to exceed $60,000 that would cover the sediment trap first to a depth of 8 to 10 feet, then go toward other Cove dredging at their discretion, bearing in mind that 4-5 feet is sufficient for recreational boating, with the project at an 80-20% split with the Cove residents, Kramer seconded. Jim Willey from the public requested that the Board do an 80-20% split and pay for the sediment trap.

Colgan amended his motion to be a 80-20% split project not to exceed $50,000 paying for the sediment trap first followed by dredging of the Cove with the expectation of appropriate easements for the Board to access and maintain the sediment trap, Leonard seconded. Individual votes tallied as all yeses, motion passed.

Herman rescinded his original motion, Kramer seconded, all approved, motion rescinded.

The Board considered possible action on Bruce Schneider’s matching request in the amount of $32,100. This is for a dredge project that has already been completed and yet to be done.

Davidson motioned for a funded amount not to exceed $30,000 for work completed and work yet to be done using an 80-20% split, Herman seconded.

It was agreed that the work remaining for this dredge project amounts to approximately 4,000 cubic yards of sediment in order to create an average of between 7 to 12 feet depth. Concern was expressed regarding the recreational and safety benefits for this project, as well as the fact that it is asking for reimbursement after the fact, which sets a new precedent. A desire for additional sediment amount measurements by Lidar was expressed.

Davidson amended his motion to table possible action on Bruce Schneider’s matching request until more information can be obtained by Lidar, Herman seconded, motion approved.

The Hartwick West project was not yet prepared to present regarding their project match request. Burger motioned to table the Hartwick West project, Kramer seconded, motion approved.

The Board considered possible action on the North Beach cleanup and stump removal. This area has had some mechanical and hands-on cutting, but there are still a great deal of willow stumps that will be a significant safety hazard once the lake fills as the water will only go 2 feet above them. An estimate of $1,500 to remove the stumps has been obtained, assuming the ability to use non-asphalt roads to travel to the site.

Herman motioned to approve project funding not to exceed $2,000 for North Beach cleanup and stump removal if the Board can get agreeable access to the site location, Leonard seconded, motion approved.

The Board heard committee updates.

The Lake Bed Cleanup Committee had a hand-cutting day a few weekends ago in areas that are not machine accessible. It was very successful, and appreciation was expressed to those who came and helped. Cleanup is going very well with only a few small pockets remaining.

The Dredge Committee recognized a property owner who has done shoreline work and removed 200 dump trucks of sediment from the lake at his own expense and at no cost to the community.

The Dam Construction Committee states that construction is ongoing 6 days a week with lights to work into the evening. GCI will only take one day off for Thanksgiving, one and a half for Christmas, and one for New Year’s Day. The stop log hoists have arrived and will soon be placed. The emergency diesel generator will be started on December 14th. Colgan estimates the project completion date to be in January.

The Water Quality Committee has sent in a packet of information with proposed thoughts regarding a water quality initiative going forward, which will be reviewed and looked at in more depth in the coming month. The Board is going down the path of creating the Maquoketa River Watershed Management Authority in cooperation with many different stakeholders along the Maquoketa River to create agreements for high water quality.  This Authority would help water quality to be a more connected effort and not just a “Lake Delhi” effort. Lobbyists will be engaged next session for funding regarding the Authority.

The Funding/Finance Committee had no updates.

The Legislative Committee had no updates.

The floor was opened for public comment.

Ed Schmidt asked what the large white x’s in his fields were. It was confirmed that those were for spotting for the upcoming flyover mapping.

Jim Willey stated that there is information regarding 5 feet being the appropriate depth range for recreational boating and believes the Board should not pay for dredging beyond that. He stated that the Board needs to be fair to all taxpayers and consider what has been done in the past.

Larry Peter stated that if the Board opens up cost shares to retroactive projects, it will be a bad precedent. He also asked regarding easements to put lines across the dredge site property should it be transferred to the District, and it was confirmed there is a legal easement for the pipeline and outflow.

Jim Willey stated he remembered there being language that said the dredge site could be transferred between organization types. Such language has not yet been found, and it was suggested to look into past meeting minutes.

No further public comment.

Davidson motioned to adjourn, Kramer seconded, meeting adjourned at 9:02 PM.

Minutes from November 4, 2015

The Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District

Board of Trustees

Special Meeting

November 4, 2015

6:30 PM

Lake Delhi Trustees Administration Building

Delhi, IA

A special meeting of the Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District was called to order by President Steve Leonard at 6:30 PM.

Trustees present: Davidson, Leonard, Kramer, Colgan (Herman & Burger via phone)

Trustees absent: Gifford

Visitors: Larry & Eve Peter, Ed Schmidt, Pat & Don Dede, Chloe Colgan, Wanda Davidson

Motion to approve the agenda as posted was made by Davidson, second by Kramer. Motion approved.

Motion by Kramer, second by Davidson to approve Lunda Pay Request #18. Colgan explained that this pay request was for work done in August and is likely the last pay request from Lunda for the Phase I contract. Motion carried.

Kramer asked for approval to request reimbursement from the Community Fund to Rebuild Lake Delhi for the amount of the approved Lunda invoice which is $112, 341.67. Motion to approve was made by Colgan, second by Davidson. Motion carried.

Motion to approve Stanley Supplemental Agreement #38 for additional soil borings was made by Kramer, second by Colgan. Colgan reminded everyone that we’ve already done many borings in the lake bed. The purpose of the borings is to map the sediment depth based on an agreement we have with the Corp of Engineers where native materials are identified along with the depth of sediment on top of that material.   This agreement provides for additional borings to be done mainly in the Cedars area which includes a major silt trap if the District should want it for future use. Braun has been in the area staking out the boring locations and work could begin as early as tomorrow and should take a couple of weeks. The total agreement is for $12,500. Davidson asked is there had been borings done in the Schmidt/Schneider cove and the Turtle Creek cove. Colgan and Leonard responded that those borings have been done. Leonard added that in his conversations with the Corp of Engineers and Stanley Consultants, the requirements for the borings were a minimum of 250 feet apart to minimize the number of borings done. No other discussion. Motion carried.

Motion by Davidson, second by Colgan to adjourn. Motion carried.

 

 

Minutes from October 15, 2015

The Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District Board of Trustees

Regular Meeting

October 15, 2015

6:30 PM

Lake Delhi Trustees Administration Building

Delhi, IA

 

The regular meeting of the Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District was called to order by President Steve Leonard at 6:30 PM.

 

Trustees present: Gifford, Davidson, Leonard, Kramer, Herman, Burger

Trustees absent: Colgan

Recording secretary: Shelley Kallenbach

Visitors: Larry Peter, Chip Hughes, Carol Pohlman, Becky Willey, Jim Willey, Don Dede, Pat Dede, Ed Schmidt, Jim Locke, Ken DeKlotz, Barb DeKlotz, Dean Montour, Marlene Montour, Marcheta Cooey-Lux, Nancy Hurt, Larry Aschbrenner, Tom Cook, Marilyn Cook

 

Motion to approve the agenda as posted made by Davidson, seconded by Burger, motion approved.

 

Motion to approve the posted September 17, 2015 and October 5, 2015 meeting minutes made by Burger, seconded by Herman, motion approved.

 

Requests for payment from the District were presented by Kramer. Payments from the General Fund were presented in the amount of $2,549.43 for electricity, copier, warrants, and lobbyist expenses. Payments from the Dam Spillway Fund in the amount of $193,627.12 were for Phase 2 payment to GCI, engineering services to Stanley Consultants, and legal services. Herman motioned to receive and file the payments as presented, Gifford seconded, motion approved.

 

Motion for a request to Delaware County for reimbursement for invoices paid by the District for the spillway rebuild in the amount of $93,131.81 was made by Burger, seconded by Kramer. This represents the 50% county reimbursement for Phase 2 payments to GCI. Motion approved.

 

Motion for a request to the Community Fund to Rebuild Lake Delhi for reimbursement for invoices paid by the District for the dam rebuild in the amount of $617,928.21, which represents the half of the GCI payments not covered by alternate sources, was made by Herman, seconded by Gifford, motion approved.

 

Kramer presented financial statements as of September 30, 2015. The General Fund had revenues of $72,322.50 from a county tax draw and interest, and expenditures in the amount of $8,930.05 for insurance, lobbyist, and general expenses, ending the month at $272,779.22. The Debt Service Fund had revenues in the amount of $164,569.86 from Delaware County and interest, ending the month at $244,744.38. The Dam/Spillway Project Fund had revenues of $189,549,68 from the DNR and interest, and expenditures in the amount of $307,923.46 for Phase 2, engineering, and attorney payments, ending the month at $3,645,869.38. Burger motioned to approve and file the posted financial statements, Gifford seconded. The lobbyist expense was clarified to include two bills for $2000 each, and clarification regarding the overall payment big picture was requested. Further information would be discussed later, but it was confirmed that the financials are projected to be looking good for the ending of the project. Motion to approve the financial reports approved.

 

Motion to approve a request for a donation in the amount of $23,553.00 to the LDRA for the December 1st, 2015 interest payment was made by Burger, seconded by Kramer. Herman clarified that he had researched these donations and that there is no legal requirement for the Board to pay them, though there may be a moral obligation, but feels he does not yet know enough about the donation requests at this point to vote in favor of this obligation. Votes listed as all ayes, one nay (Herman), motion approved.

 

Matching requests from various associates were considered by the Board.

 

The Linden Road Association presented a request for an 80-20% reimbursement from the Board in the amount of $2,644.00 for work done by the Linden Road, Inc. This work includes stump removal and siltation reduction to allow for an average of 2-3 feet of water over their island. Davidson motioned to approve this 80-20% reimbursement, Kramer seconded. It was confirmed that the existing stumps presented a significant safety hazard as noticed during the tree-cutting day, as well as the fact that this is away from boat docks in a navigable area of the lake. The Association was commended for the initiative and the work to make this area deeper and wider, therefore increasing boater safety. Motion to approve an 80-20% reimbursement to Linden Road, Inc. carried.

 

The Turtle Creek Association reimbursement request is ongoing, and a conclusion is expected at the end of the week. Motion to table discussion regarding reimbursement for the Turtle Creek Association project made by Gifford, seconded by Herman, motion approved.

 

The Board heard committee updates.

 

The Lake Bed Cleanup Committee stated that another lakebed cleanup community day is being organized to occur within the next few weeks. Information on this hand-cutting event will be forthcoming. The Committee continues to solicit specific description of existing debris to remove prior to lake fill.

 

The Dredge Committee is looking at the Turtle Creek project. During the course of the project, the county engineer has approved dumping siltation loads in sharp culverts along area roadways. In addition, Randy Harbach has offered to take an unlimited amount of any material to fill the areas where clay has been removed for the dam rebuild. This means there are significant opportunities to place material if associations have a way to remove it, and the Board encouraged associations to consider these new disposal options. Braun will be returning within the next 2 weeks to complete soil borings in the northern part of the lake. More data regarding soil boring work costs will be available at the next meeting.

 

Leonard presented Dam Construction updates in Colgan’s absence. Work on the downstream and upstream retaining walls is ongoing, as are buttress and base concrete pours. Sheet pile driving continues and is 65% complete. The spillway will visibly take shape in the next few weeks. GCI is working 6 days a week from sunup to sundown to complete the work quickly.

 

Larry Peter presented additional dam construction updates. The DNR requires a minimum of 83 cfs water flow to fill the lake, and currently the river is flowing at 68 cfs. Therefore, if the dam were done today, it could not be filled until the cfs flow met DNR requirements. The Burrington Group will be in charge of paperwork, training, and manpower for running the dam. The massive size of the spillway was discussed. Unique methods are being used to drive the sheet pile due to the high strength of the clay. GCI has two crews working on opposite sides of the dam to build the labyrinth spillway as quickly as possible.

 

The Water Quality Committee presented updates. A presentation will be coming to the Board shortly regarding funding and options for a watershed management plan. Next week the Committee will have a meeting with members of the NRCS, DNR, city officials, legislators, and County Conservation to look at past watershed plans and determine how to best move forward with watershed and siltation management.

 

The Finance and Legislative Committees had no additional updates.

 

The floor was opened for public comment.

 

Concern was expressed for future funding due to Lake Delhi not meeting the 400 to 1 government criteria to be in the public lake programs by the DNR. This was noted, but the Board also stated that that is only one avenue to solve funding requirements.

 

Clarification regarding the current financial standing of the dam rebuild was requested. Estimates of financials were given; however, as these numbers are fluctuating, they were only estimates. Approximately 5.3 million remains available to spend from multiple sources, and there are remaining obligations to GCI and Stanley of approximately 4 million. Therefore, it is estimated that barring unexpected costs, the project is estimated to finish with approximately 1 million in funds leftover taking into consideration all funding sources.. However, these are high-level estimates, and administrative effort would be necessary to offer more specific numbers. However, the Board is confident in saying that without any additional major unplanned expenses, the dam is expected to come in safely under all funding source revenues options.

 

Concerns regarding the approval of the Linden Road Association 80-20% approval were expressed. A member of the public stated that the Board should have an overall dredge plan regarding these requests. Concern that siltation is not being removed, but only moved to places that may impact other places in the future, was also expressed. Information on total funds available for such reimbursements was also requested.

 

The Board clarified that each project presented for reimbursement is unique and is reviewed on individual merit to the lake. There is no ultimate limit on reimbursements available, as the Board will consider all association reimbursement requests individually. Projects do not necessarily have to be for siltation removal, but can also be for other needs that improve the safety and functionality of the lake in the little time remaining prior to lake fill. Such needs may include stump and tree removal. Each project will be reviewed uniquely regardless of amount requested. It was reiterated that there is very little time remaining to manage safety issues at a cheaper price point prior to lake fill, and as such the Board must be given leeway to make decisions quickly given this timeframe. The Turtle Creek Association reimbursement decision was made using a cost benefit analysis from 5-year-old bids for hydraulic dredging that were confirmed to still be approximately accurate, which estimated an overall cost savings of near $100,000 to the Board if the work was completed prior to lake fill. This data was discussed in previous meeting minutes. This demonstrated the way that each project will be reviewed individually for its potential improvement to the lake as well as a cost benefit analysis. It was confirmed that the Board has access to multiple lasers to allow for specific numbers regarding the amount of siltation removed in the Turtle Creek project. This will confirm the new water depths. This data will be obtained and reviewed for the public. It was confirmed that the Linden Acres project is complete and was fundamentally different than the Turtle Creek Project. It was suggested that if members of the public have concerns with individual projects, to contact the Board members directly to discuss specific concerns prior to voting regarding the specific project reimbursement.

 

A member of the public described debris to be removed prior to lake fill. The Lake Bed Cleanup Committee noted this location for removal.

 

The public expressed concern regarding association dredging to virgin ground. It was confirmed that soil boring measurements are shared with the associations so they are made aware of virgin ground levels.

 

The public requested a date for the lake to be refilled so the public could know when projects much be completed. It was confirmed that the lake will be filled as soon as possible. However, this date is dependent upon weather and river flow levels. If the weather and river flow levels permit, the lake will be filled immediately upon dam completion before winter. However, it is currently impossible to know these dates because of the unpredictability of rain totals and winter freeze dates. Projects should be completed as soon as possible, as the lake will be filled as soon as the dam completion, weather, and as water flow permits. No delays will be made unless required by weather or water flow.

 

A member of the public expressed disappointment that there was a Trustee who voted no on the vote regarding donations to the LDRA, as it is felt that the lake would not exist without the LDRA and therefore the Board has a strong moral obligation to provide LDRA donations.

 

A member of the public asked what the lobbyists are currently working on. It was confirmed that they are working on watershed and siltation management plans, funding, and the move from reconstruction to lake management by putting Lake Delhi on the list of Iowa public lakes.

 

An update on FEMA work was requested. Work is ongoing with both FEMA and Homeland Security, and it is felt that this FEMA and Homeland Security group is friendlier than groups in the past. Work is ongoing to confirm that the appropriate funds were spent in the appropriate amounts.

 

An update was requested regarding the Harbach land purchase. Currently the LDRA owns that land, and according to FEMA, the District needs to own it. The District is trying to negotiate a resolution. The Harbachs have the right of first refusal in the event of a sale. The Board is interested in a legal determination that this transfer would not be considered a sale. If a resolution cannot be negotiated, legal action will be pursued for a solution that benefits all parties.

 

No further public comment.

 

Burger motioned to adjourn, Kramer seconded, meeting adjourned at 7:41 PM.

Minutes from October 5, 2015

The Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District

Special Meeting

October 5, 2015

6:30 PM

Lake Delhi Administration Building

Delhi, IA

A special meeting of the Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District was called to order by President Steve Leonard at 6:35 PM.

 

Trustees Present: Leonard, Colgan, Davidson, Burger, Kramer

Trustees Absent: Gifford, Herman

Recording Secretary: Absent

Visitors: Larry Peter, Eve Peter, Pat Dede, Don Dede, Ed Schmidt, Jim Locke, Lou Christiansen, Sue Christiansen, Jim Willey, Becky Willey, Ben Pasker, Ben Kindred, Randy Rattenborg, Chip Hughes, Bob Galiher, Chloe Colgan, Dan Reyner

 

President Leonard reviewed the agenda noting that two timely additions were added. Those were a consideration of payment to General Constructors and consideration to request reimbursement from the County for invoices related to the spillway rebuild.

 

Motion to approve the amended agenda made by Davidson, seconded by Kramer, motion approved.

 

Leonard asked Pat Colgan to present the proposal from Burrington Group for services required for Lake Delhi startup and operations management. Colgan reminded those in attendance that the District’s operating plan was approved in May of 2014. At last month’s meeting Colgan received approval from the Board to get a proposal put together from Burrington Group. This proposal would be for the administrative part of operating the dam. Colgan has also reached out to Lunda Construction for a proposal for the mechanical operation of the dam as well as Price Electric and Jetco who would cover the software operations of the dam.   Burrington Group would be responsible for all recordkeeping, providing an Emergency Action Plan and 24/7 monitoring of the dam. The proposal includes a provision to adjust the contract every three months based on the needs of the District. Colgan than asked for formal approval of the Burrington Group Proposal. Motion made by Burger, second by Davidson. Leonard asked for comments from Randy Rattenborg, President of Burrington Group. Rattenborg said he has three employees on staff that will be trained to operate the dam and they will be ready to start when the District asks that of them. Colgan mentioned that the way this dam is going to operate is that water will flow over the dam 365 days a year. Operating flow will be between 100 cfs and 400-500 cfs which is about 2-3” above the spillway and that will occur about 85% of the time. 85% of the time the gates will be closed given that the top of the spillway is 1” below lake level. In other words, 85% of the time the operations of the dam will be daily walk-throughs to make sure no incidents have occurred like boats being hung up near the spillway, vandalism, etc. Colgan also explained that once water flows exceed 500 cfs there’s a protocol that the gates will automatically begin to open in one inch increments depending on the flow. Even with the automation of the lake, there are requirements for people onsite. This is what was required for our permit with the State. It was reiterated that the proposal with Burrington Group will be reviewed every three months since this is a new operation and it’s understood the proposal may need to be adjusted as we move forward. It is not a contract at this point and will need to be reviewed by the DNR for us to move forward. Leonard asked for a vote from the Trustees. All ayes, motion carried.

 

Kramer asked for consideration to pay the interest due on our GO Bond Debt Service which is due 12/1/15. The interest is in the amount of $115,323.75 along with a $250 bond registrar fee. Motion by Burger, second by Davidson. Motion carried.

 

Kramer asked for consideration for Payment #6 from General Constructors in the amount of $1,088,273.91. Colgan explained that GCI is under the gun to get done this fall. The coffer dam needs to be removed as well. GCI has been working two shifts six days a week to keeping things moving. As has been discussed in previous meetings, the failure of the first cofferdam caused about a 3 ½ week delay. There was also a lot more earth and dike material required. To give some perspective as to what is left to do, in September there were 25 concrete pours completed. There’s another 40 left to go. GCI, along with Brian Monk, and other crews are working hard to keep things moving quickly. The major expenses included in this invoice include downstream training wall work, soil removal and embankment fill. There’s still an expectation that we will be $400,000 under-budget with the GCI contract.   Leonard asked for motion to approve. Colgan motioned to approve, Burger seconded. Motion carried.

 

Kramer asked for approval for a request to the Delaware County Supervisors for 50% of the approved GCI invoice in the amount of $544,136.95. Colgan made the motion to approve, Kramer seconded. Motion carried.

 

Leonard presented a request from that he received from Deer Run Lane for reimbursement for lake bed work done in their area. He mentioned that at the last board meeting we had approved a couple different association requests for reimbursement in the form of an 80/20 match for lake bed work/and or sand removal. Deer Run Lane stated they restored depths in a 600 ft. by 200 ft. distance from 1-2 feet down to a level of 4-7 feet. The cost to the association was $4,860.00. In their letter they are requesting an 80% reimbursement or $3,888.00. Leonard asked for a motion to approve the Deer Run Lane request. Colgan made the motion to approve, Burger seconded. Motion carried.

 

Leonard shared additional information regarding the 2009 estimated dredge costs done by Brennan. The general rule of thumb is the further the area is away from the dredge site, the more costly it would be to dredge based on a per cubic. For example, Hickory Hollow near the dam would cost $42.00 per cubic yard versus way upstream where the cost would be $7.00 per cubic yard at the Cedars.   The cost difference is significant. At our last meeting we went through an evaluation process to develop criteria moving forward in anticipation of other road association requests. They included cost effectiveness, safety, high public recreational area and distance from docks. Leonard presented a complete mapping of the results of the most recent soil borings that were done a few weeks ago. Borings were taken from the dam area all the way up past the Maples but not including the Cedars area. Those borings will be done in the next few weeks.   He pointed out that at Hickory Hollow near the dam most of the sediment is 6+ feet and depths range from 2-4 feet. The Hickory Hollow Association is working with a contractor to take deal with the sand and take the depths from 2-3 feet up to about 6-8 feet at a cost of about $10,000. The work is scheduled to start in the next couple of days. In addition, Trustees have reached out to a number of different associations to let them know about this opportunity to remove siltation based on the criteria the District has outlined. Some areas could take advantage of this but others will probably have to wait until we can dredge with hydraulic equipment.   Hydraulic dredging will probably be most cost effective for those areas closer to the dredge site. One of those areas is Linden Acres. They have a between 6 and 10’ of sand-based sedimentation. They have a contractor looking at the area and hope to make a presentation to the District at our next board meeting. This area also has stumps from the tree cutting that was done in August at creates a safety concern. A bulldozer may need to be used to removed those stumps as there around 500-1000 stumps and they range in size from 1- 2 ½ inches thick. Leonard indicated that the key to the mapping various areas of that lake is that that we know the depths of the lake and the siltation levels. We need to continue to evaluate very closely the cost effectiveness versus hydraulic dredging, the high recreational value of the area and whether there are public safety concerns.

 

Hickory Hollow asked Leonard to formally present their request for approval for to do work in their area since they have a contractor lined up to do the work very soon.   The cost is not to exceed $10,000. Colgan made the motion to approve, Kramer seconded followed by discussion. Colgan asked if $10,000 was the total cost. Leonard indicated that was correct so with an 80/20 split the District would pay $8,000. Kramer asked if Hickory Hollow would present the District with actual costs as was done by Deer Run Lane. Leonard said that was correct. Colgan said he felt with the additional boating and public access there is a legitimate concern for boating safety in the shallow areas. He also said that given the location of Hickory Hollow, the cost to hydraulically dredge versus what their association proposes to do would be extremely more expensive. This is a great opportunity to take the sediment out. In two months, these opportunities will go away. Leonard said that it the Dredge Committee including himself, Doug Herman and Todd Gifford, have been working to develop a complete dredge strategy along with a watershed management strategy. They have been working with the NRCS, the DNR, the Corp of Engineers and all other regulatory authorities.   The common theme is that we need a very large siltation trap – about 300 yards long and about 100 yards wide to manage the amount of siltation coming in. This is much larger than we’ve had in the past. The recommended place is in the Cedars area, close to the current dredge site. There has also been contact with the quarry upstream. Bard Concrete recently purchased the quarry and has been doing some small level dredging. The plan is a long way from being finalized but the main focus right now is to take care of areas that are most cost effective and have safety concerns.   There being no further discussion, Leonard asked for a vote on the motion. All ayes. Motion carried.

 

Leonard also indicated he had been in contact with Bob Galiher regarding the Freddie’s Beach area. Currently there doesn’t seem to be a creative solution to help those areas. He also mentioned that Oasis Well Drilling has offered to do is lend us their laser equipment so we can now get down to the inch of depths. This equipment was used at Linden Acres and will be used at other potential sites like the Cedars in the near future. It will confirm the accuracy of our lidar results.

 

Leonard asked for other comments. Burger asked that any future considerations from associations be forwarded to all the Trustees. Davidson presented a request from Bruce Schneider for work he did in his area. Leonard asked Davidson to give a short overview of the area. There was a short discussion of the depths in that area. Leonard asked that the Schenider request along with the request from Linden Acres be put on the October 15th agenda.

 

Public Comment:

 

There was a concern raised over the work done at Deer Run Lane and how much material was removed. Leonard said that anyone who went out to the site could see the difference in the depth from before the work began. There was also a question regarding where the money was coming from to pay for the work done by the road associations. Kramer stated the money is being paid from the money the District receives from the $4.00/$1000 taxes.

 

A question was raised regarding the use of state, county or bond funds for dredging. Leonard replied that neither state or county funds can be used for dredging. The bond funds or our general fund can be used to pay for dredging expenses.

 

Another question that was asked is if the District knows how much dredging the whole lake would cost. Leonard indicated that we don’t have that information at this time. Another lidar test will be done in the next 30 days to confirm the accuracy of what we had after the breach of the dam. Soil borings were done very recently.

 

A concern was raised that the Board needs to understand what the costs are to dredge throughout the entire lake and where those dollars are going to come from before spending any dollars on current lake bed projects. There were also concerns about moving materials rather than removing the same.

 

A question was concerned about hydraulic dredging given the current dredge site is not been transferred.

 

A request was asked that the Board reconsider their motion to pay Deer Run Lane until information regarding the amount of material removed is obtained.

 

A question was asked about the estimated cost of for using Burrington Group for the day-to-day operations of the dam. Leonard said the current number is $27,000 per year for the on call service portion.

 

There was a question regarding debris removal from the lake. Colgan indicated that the District will be asking for proposals as he currently has three bidders interested in the job.

 

A concern was raised about the safety process for removing debris and maintenance of the flood gates. Burger explained that this a brand new dam and it’s a new process. Old procedures do not apply.

 

A question was asked about how much money has been set aside for road association dredge projects. Leonard responded that we don’t have a set budget.   Given the fact that there are time restrictions, we can only hope more associations come forward.

 

There was discussion regarding the Turtle Creek Park project. A concern was raised that members of that association didn’t have full understanding of the proposal that was submitted to the District. Leonard said concerns should be addressed to the association’s officers as the District is only receiving proposals and are not involved in the decisions made by the association.

 

A concern again was raised that the Deer Run Lane project was approved without a cost based on the cubic yards removed. Leonard said the basis doesn’t always have to be about the yards removed. He believes the Board approved what they believe to be a cost effective project to spend $3,888 to now have 6-7 feet depths of recreational level for the public to use.

 

A question was asked if one of the criteria for approval of an association’s proposal was to have the material removed. The Board responded no.

 

It was asked again to have the motion to rescind the motion to approve payment to Deer Run Lane. Leonard asked the Board if any one of them would like to rescind the motion. No board member asked for the motion to rescinded.

 

It was suggested that the spending of these dollars could be construed as a mis-appropriations of funds. Burger said he did not feel that was the case. He suggested that in the future the District possibly consider asking for the quantity of cubic yards being removed but he felt the proposal the District approved tonight is still cost effective. There was no action by the Board that the quantity of cubic yards taken were required.

 

Leonard suggested that we consider adding additional criteria for association proposals for reimbursement to the next agenda.

 

Kramer moved to adjourn, second by Burger. Motion approved.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Minutes from September 17, 2015

The Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District

Regular Meeting

September 17, 2015

6:30 PM

Lake Delhi Administration Building

Delhi, IA

 

The regular meeting of the Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District was called to order by President Steve Leonard at 6:30 PM.

 

Trustees Present: Leonard, Gifford, Davidson, Burger, Kramer, Herman, Colgan

Trustees Absent: None

Recording Secretary: Shelley Kallenbach

Visitors: Wanda Davidson, Larry Peter, Eve Peter, John Carbaugh, Pauletta Carbaugh, Pat Dede, Don Dede, Ed Schmidt, Jim Locke, Ken DeKlotz, Barb DeKlotz, Dave Larson, Mike Ryan, Lou Christiansen, Sue Christiansen, Larry Aschbrenner, Ben Pasker, Dan Reyner, Tom Mahoney, Dan Staebell

 

Motion to add consideration on a request to the Community Fund to Rebuild Lake Delhi for reimbursement for invoices paid by the District for the dam rebuild to the agenda was made by Davidson, seconded by Burger, motion approved.

 

Motion to approve the amended agenda made by Herman, seconded by Colgan, motion approved.

 

Motion to approve the August 6, 2015 and July 23, 2015 meeting minutes as posted made by Herman, seconded by Gifford, motion approved.

 

Kramer presented claims for payment. Claims in the amount of $8,803.40 for copier maintenance, election expense, liability insurance coverage, and lobbyist expense were presented from the General Fund. Claims in the amount of $307,923.46 for Phase 2 construction, engineering services, and legal real estate services were presented from the Fund 81002. Burger motioned to approve payments as presented, Gifford seconded, motion approved.

 

The Board considered a request to Delaware County for reimbursement for invoices paid for the spillway rebuild. The County Supervisors had questions about the August 6th request regarding miscellaneous incidentals, which were confirmed to be rent and utilities payments for the on-site supervisor. The County requested an amended request by the District for $209,797.68. Davidson motioned to approve the amended request for reimbursement, Gifford seconded, motion approved.

 

A motion to request reimbursement from Delaware County for invoices paid for the spillway rebuild in the amount of $105,557.23 was made by Herman, seconded by Burger, motion approved.

 

A motion to request reimbursement from the DNR for invoices paid for the dam rebuild in the amount of $122,249.91 was made by Gifford, seconded by Burger, motion approved. Kramer noted that this will be the last of the $5 million funds available from the State of Iowa /DNR.

 

Since the Iowa/DNR funds are now expended, a motion to request reimbursement from the Community Fund to Rebuild Lake Delhi in the amount of $31,217.32 for invoices for the dam rebuild was made by Herman and seconded by Gifford. This will be the first amount requested from the Community Fund. Reimbursement requests and payments from the fund go through the Community Fund Advisors and the County Auditor. Our understanding is that there is approximately $1.5 million is available in the Community Fund. All ayes, motion approved.

 

Kramer presented the financial reports from July and August. In July, the General Fund had interest income and minor expenses for utilities and copier maintenance to end at $187,526.40. The Debt Service Fund had $6.48 of interest income from Delaware County to end at $22,718.22. The Dam/Spillway Project Fund had income from interest and County reimbursement for $157,251.99 to end at $4,086,778.64. In August, the General Fund had income from the County and interest of $25,356.97, and costs for office maintenance as well as lobbyist and attorney fees of $3,496.60 to end August at $209,386.77. The Debt Service Fund had income of $57,456.30 from the County and interest to end August at $80,174.52. The Dam/Spillway Project Fund had income of $359.405.49 from the DNR and interest, and expenditures of $681,940.97 for Phase 1 and 2 payments as well as engineering expense, ending August at $3,764,243.16. Colgan motioned to file the financial reports as presented, Burger seconded, motion approved.

 

The Board considered action on Stanley Supplemental Agreement #36 in the amount of $5,000. Colgan explained that this is an amount added to the soil borings budget to make a sediment trap per Stanley Engineering’s recommendation. This sediment trap would be significantly cheaper in that it removes sediment from the river bas to be dredged later. Herman motioned to approve Supplemental Agreement #36, Kramer seconded, motion approved.

The Board considered action on Stanley Supplemental Agreement #37 in the amount of $18,000. Colgan and Leonard explained this is the cost of an aerial survey to map lake bottom contours to be completed just before lake fill to map the lake bottom. This data will be kept on file in the event of any future FEMA needs, as this is important information for any future funding requirements. Davidson motioned to approve Supplemental Agreement #37, Herman seconded, motion approved.

 

Colgan presented information regarding the Emergency Action Plan and the Operation and Maintenance Plan for the Lake Delhi Dam once opened. The DNR has already approved the operation and maintenance plan pending official dates. The new dam will have flow over the labyrinth spillway. In addition, 85% of the time the floodgates will be closed and there is no operation necessary other than daily routine inspections.  Floodgate operation is automated up to the full design flood. The lake will no longer store water. A flood plain permit and water storage permit are already issued from the DNR, so once the dam is completed, we are approved to fill the lake once we finalize the operating plan adding names of who is responsible to operate the dam. Therefore, it is necessary to now contract for a full-time operator for the lake’s operation and maintenance to meet DNR requirements.

 

In addition, it is necessary to have an emergency action plan prepared for public safety. The DNR also approved this emergency action plan pending official dates. Other important items to be aware of as we go forward include, the floodgates will nearly always be closed, and water will pass over the spillway which will be marked with buoys with solar lights and a cable system. A warning horn will sound prior to the floodgates opening. The DNR also approved this emergency action plan pending official dates.

 

The DNR requires the District to be responsible for observation, recordkeeping, and maintenance of Lake Delhi, including daily inspections, annual inspections, random DNR inspections, and 5-year formal inspections. It is necessary to hire another firm to handle these administrative tasks.

 

Colgan proposed that the Board request a bid proposal from the Burrington Group in Manchester to handle these administrative tasks. This would include 24-7 coverage with on-duty personnel, recordkeeping, and overnight emergency call services. This will also include a time and materials contract from Lunda for maintenance services, Price Electric for electrical services, Jetco who is responsible for the dam computer (PLC) software design on retainer for technology services. None of these firms will have any decision-making capability other than what is contracted by the District; they will simply be maintaining the dam per the District’s specifications. Motion to approve the request for a bid proposal from the Burrington Group for an emergency action plan and operation and maintenance plan with a special meeting called to consider such proposal when received was made by Burger, seconded by Kramer, motion approved.

 

Gifford presented a request for reimbursement for sedimentation removal. Bill Havertape wrote a proposal to share or reimburse a dry dredge project on the Turtle Creek South area. This is a popular boating and recreational location, primarily for boat turn-arounds. This proposal includes a dredge area of 60,000 square feet and a prepared free disposal to a farm within an eighth of a mile. Without dredging, this area will be very shallow or above water after lake fill. The Turtle Creek Camp Road Association has already agreed to contribute $3,500 toward the project, which is proposed to cost a total of $18,680. Leonard highlighted that traditional dredge proposal estimates prior to the dam breach listed costs to dredge this area at $110,000, making the proposal a significant cost savings to dredging after lake fill. The area is 30 to 50 feet off shoreline, so thus not privately used property. The Board considers this an opportunity for this particular association and other associations desiring to complete projects, for example dredging, prior to lake fill at a cheaper cost. It was agreed that a cost share would be most appropriate as these projects will be the various associations’ responsibility, with only financial assistance from the Board. It was agreed that an 80-20% cost share would be implemented. The Board will consider all project proposals for cost shares by considering the cost effectiveness, the areas’ distance from the shoreline, safety and the public’s recreational use of the area. This has not been done earlier since it was not known until recently whether funds would be available after the dam build to accommodate such a cost share program. The Board applauded the efforts of the Turtle Creek Camp Road Association to create a full proposal to the Board.

 

Leonard presented a request from the Deer Run Lane project manager for a cost-share project with what is called the Hartwick Dredge Area as shown by the dredge map that Stanley provided and Leonard presented to the Board. The project manager provided Leonard a proposal for lake bed work to create an approximate depth of 6 feet in this area and has made all the contractor arrangements. The estimated cost is expected to be around $6,000. Per the previous discussion, an 80-20% split was agreed upon. Colgan motioned to approve an 80-20% cost share split for these proposed dry dredge projects pending trustee confirmation of work performed, Davidson seconded, motion approved.

 

The Board heard committee updates.

 

The Lake Bed Cleanup Committee gave updates. Some machine cutting on the south side of the lake will happen this weekend with one large machine and possibly with two. The north side of the lake will be done prior to snowfall. Another hand cutting event to be determined will be held in October. Road management is asked to take over brush management. It is possible that it may be too dry for brush burns.

 

The Dredge Committee presented updates. Stanley Construction recommends a siltation trap as large as possible in the upper portion of the lake to minimize siltation further down the lake.

 

The Legislative Committee is also working to capitalize on all the information available to make a good recommendation for facility management funding.

 

The Dam Construction Committee presented updates. In Phase 2, the earthen dam has been completed and concrete is now being poured. The contractor is working 6 days a week to complete work. It looks good for a late fall finish.

 

The Water Quality and Funding/Finance Committees had no updates.

 

The floor was opened for public comment.

 

Barb DeKlotz stated there will be an LDRA annual meeting on Sunday, September 20, in Delhi, with the agenda to be determined.

 

It was asked how to determine the water level when considering potential boating problems in various areas. It was recommended to use laser measurement/GPS elevation levels.

 

A question was raised regarding siltation depth removal and permits. The soil boring work was done to allow for siltation removal for one foot above virgin ground. The Board would work with associations making proposals regarding this.

 

Jim Locke asked if anything could be done with the quarry in regards to the dredge trap. It was confirmed that this was being considered by the Board but the Board had no immediate answers. The Board confirms this looks like a good opportunity and will look into potential options.

 

Jim Locke asked for a Quaker Mill project update. The Board had no updates on this project.

 

Leonard reiterated the important takeaways from this meeting: The Board approved a 80-20% cost share for projects for lake bed work by considering cost analysis, high recreational use areas that could also present a safety concern, and locations far enough off the shoreline to not be of personal benefit. He also reminded those interested to get himself or another Trustee involved if a reimbursement will be requested for a project.

 

Davidson motioned to adjourn, Burger seconded, motion approved. The meeting was adjourned at 8:02 PM.