The Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District

Special Meeting

Saturday, May 7, 2016

9:00 A.M.

Lake Delhi Trustees Administration Building

Delhi, IA

A special meeting of the Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District was called to order by President Steve Leonard at 9:00 a.m.

Trustees present: Leonard, Kramer, Davidson, Herman and Burger, Gifford & Colgan via phone

Trustees absent: None

Visitors: Diane Bauers, Larry Peter, Ed Schmidt, Dave Larson, Barbara & Ken DeKlotz, Lou & Sue Christensen and Dan Recker

Motion to approve the agenda as read was made by Davidson, seconded by Herman. Motion carried.

Leonard explained that several months ago when Lunda Construction was still working on the final area on the north side of the dam there was a mutual agreement with the District to not have Lunda finish the project as it relates to water mitigation and erosion protection around the dam until the District could work with the neighboring property owner, Marty Pottembaum. Lunda had already put a culvert in along the road as well as some rip rap for drainage and erosion control. Leonard also explained that Lunda’s quote included more rip rap while thee proposal from MP Construction includes more concrete work which will reduce our maintenance in the long term. Bill Holman from Stanley Engineering was on site last Tuesday and reviewed the proposal from MP Construction in detail making sure it met the requirements we need. Leonard asked for a motion to approve the proposal from MP Construction with one additional item.   There’s a possibility that additional rock work may be needed as they work on the project. The estimated cost is approximately $400. Leonard asked for a motion to approve the proposal from MP Construction in the amount of $18,020. A motion to approve the proposal from MP Construction to finish the concrete work for the protection of the northern up steam portion of the dam that was originally part of the Lunda Contract for Phase I was made by Kramer, second by Herman. Davidson expressed his concern regarding the additional $400 expense. He said he felt MP Construction should be required to pay any additional costs. Leonard explained that the additional rock, if needed, would be for stability purposes and located on District property and not on Pottebaum’s property. He also noted that this work does not include replacing the guardrail and additional fencing. There being no other comment, Leonard asked for a roll call vote. All ayes, no nays. Motion carried.

Leonard opened the meeting up for public comment. Ed Schmidt asked if there were plans to deal with the erosion on the northern downstream area of the dam. Colgan confirmed that there are plans to take care of that situation.

Barb DeKlotz asked for information on the problems with gate 2 on the dam. Leonard said there are some issues regarding gate 2 but those issues will not preclude the District from filling the lake. All the manufacturers involved with the gates were out last week. A game plan is in place to get any repairs to the gates done and that all repairs are under warranty. Leonard noted that one gate not being operational only reflects 15% of our water capacity. He stated he would hate to see rumors out there that we would not be filling up the lake for any reasons because that is not the fact.   We are currently looking at about a three week time frame before the lake will start to fill and noted that it is the responsibility of the Board to communicate to the residents on the lake of any delays and or any other issues that come up that would be cause for alarm. Dave Larson asked if the gate is operational enough if we have a major water event. Leonard stated there are ways to operate the gate without all the mechanisms in place and there is a plan in place to deal with that should it ever be needed.

Ed Schmidt said he would like to see another economic impact study done showing the amount of money spent in the area since the breach. He stated there are still skeptics out in the county wondering how much money has actually been spent in the community. Gifford stated he thought the idea was a good one and that there are really two sides to the issue. One is about the money that was spent but another piece is about the actual amount of loss that occurred.

Larry Peter, a former construction committee member, presented his final report to the Board and expressed his concerns about the gate issues. Leonard responded that the concerns regarding the gate are being addressed with all manufacturers/contractors as was stated earlier.

There being no further comment, a motion to adjourn was made by Davidson, second by Herman. Motion carried.

The Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District

Regular Meeting

March 17, 2016

6:30 PM

Lake Delhi Trustees Building

Delhi, IA

The regular meeting of the Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District was called to order by President Steve Leonard at 6:32 PM.

Trustees present: Leonard, Kramer, Colgan, Gifford, Burger

Trustees absent: Davidson, Herman

Visitors: Marilyn Cook, Tom Cook, Larry Peter, Eve Peter, Pat Dede, Don Dede, Gordon Anderson, Pat Anderson, Chloe Colgan, Nancy Hurt, Dan Recker, Wayne Garvin, Jenny Garvin, Marcheta Cooey-Lux, Bill Lux

Motion to approve the agenda as posted made by Colgan, seconded by Gifford. Motion carried.

Motion to approve the minutes from February 18, 2016 and March 3, 2016 was made by Colgan, seconded by Burger.   Motion carried.

Kramer presented payments for approval. Payments in the amount of $2,436.79 for electricity, printer usage, lobbyist, publication expense, and internet were presented from the General Fund. Payments in the amount of $280,551.06 for dam operations, Phase 2 payment, and engineering services were presented from the Dam/Spillway Project Fund. Motion to approve payments as read was made by Colgan, seconded by Burger. Motion carried.

Kramer read the financial reports through February 29, 2016. The General Fund had revenues of $5,969.54 from the county and interest, and expenditures of $2,577.20. Ending balance for the General Fund was $259,061.52. The Debt Service Fund had revenues of $13,615.98 from the county and interest, and no expenditures, ending February at $193,909.22. The Dam/Spillway Project Fund had revenues of $302,018.95 from county and interest, and expenditures of $423,728.79 for Phase 2, engineering, and contracted services, ending December at

$3,348,961.00.   Motion to receive and file the financial reports made by Burger, seconded by Colgan. Motion carried.

Motion to request reimbursement in the amount of $88,111.23 from Delaware County made by Colgan, seconded by Gifford. Kramer noted that this is the final request for reimbursement from the county for the $2,999,999 that was approved for the dam spillway project.   Motion carried.

Colgan shared with the Trustees that Burrington’s proposed contract amendment defines the needs we will have based on the water flows of the lake. By working with Burrington Group we avoid expenses like payroll tax and workmans’ compensation. Jason Wenger noted there had been discussions of what is classified as an “independent contractor”. Based on conversations with others, it was determined that an independent contractor probably would not apply to someone who is scheduled on a regular basis. Burrington Group is willing to take the administrator role which includes payroll and insurance for those employees that will be doing the observations during specific flow rates as outlined in the amended contract. He also noted that these employee positions will not require heavy maintenance.   Any type of work beyond the scope of the checklist for these employees would go to an experienced contract such as Lunda. Wenger explained that in all probability a high percentage of the work on the dam will be done by volunteers who will be trained to do the daily visits. Burrington Group, under the terms of the original agreement, will be keeping a calendar to make sure there are people to cover the daily needs. If a volunteer in not available, the backup would be one of the paid employees. Colgan noted that he has a least a dozen individuals who have interest in volunteering their time with the daily inspections. He noted that this contract is for a two year period in which time the District will learn more of what their needs are and can make changes accordingly. Burger asked if the list of volunteers will be expanded in the future. Wenger said that is correct and that the expectation is that every volunteer go through a safety inspection training program. Colgan mentioned that the DNR has programs for training. Burger asked if the Board would be kept aware of any additional volunteers that are added. Wenger replied that any new volunteers would have to be approved by Burrington Group and the Trustees.

A motion to approve the proposed contract amendment with Burrington Group was made by Gifford, second by Burger. The motion was to approve Burrington hiring dam operators, adding their costs and submitting invoices to cover paid operators costs. Motion carried.

A request from the Turtle Creek Road Association for lakebed improvements was read by Kramer. The work was done in August, 2015 after their proposal was approved by the Trustees. The pay request was delayed until this time per a request from the contractor that did the work. Kramer read the request form the Turtle Creek Road Association. The amount of the request was $19,321.00 which was the amount charged by the contractor to do the work. She noted that that an additional item was added to the original proposal and that was for a culvert that was determined to be necessary during the course of the project. The request is for 80% of the completed project. Gifford asked what the amount of the original project was. Kramer said she thought around $18,700 but wasn’t sure as she didn’t have a copy of that proposal. After reviewing the minutes from that board meeting where the original proposal was approved, it was determined that the original proposal was for $18,680. Colgan expressed an interest in seeing the exact area and knowing the amount of what was taken out. Gifford said Bill Havertape has that information and that the area is documented. A motion was made by Kramer, second by Colgan to pay Turtle Creek Road Association request for reimbursement. After some discussion there was a request to revise the motion by Gifford, second by Burger to approve 80% of the original contract or $14,944. Motion carried.

The Board considered the donation request from the LDRA for the dredge debt. The LDRA requested $48,553.50 for the principal interest for the Bank Iowa loan due June 1^st. Burger motioned to approve the donation to the LDRA, Colgan seconded. Motion carried.

Consideration for action on the final agreement with the Rocky Nook Association for septic/water lines was presented by Leonard. He explained that in order to rebuild the dam and spillway it was necessary for the District to negotiate an agreement with the Rocky Nook Association to purchase the necessary property needed for the spillway. The agreement included payment for the land plus a new water/septic system. Jason Wenger from Burrington Group, who supervised the water/septic project said that the area had historically had problems but now that the work is complete he had Dennis Lyons from the County Sanitation Department inspect and he was satisfied with the work that was done. Leonard reminded the trustees that we have already paid Roger Groth for part of the work that was completed. The District is now being presented with his final two pay requests in the amount of $24,038.38. Wenger advised that the completed project by Groth came in under bid by $13,500. An additional component of the project was the electrical work needed for the pumps to operate. That work was done by Pfeiler and included a new service panel. The work is complete and they are asking for payment of $1,655.   Leonard stated that there is still a couple of areas yet to be completed. The first is a reimbursable invoice from Groth for the remaining hookups in the amount of $22,760 that will be paid once the Rocky Nook Association meets code. The second is that there are still 3-5 tanks that need to be pumped and filled in. The Rocky Nook Association will also be required to sign off on the project before that final payment is made.   Motion by Gifford, second by Kramer to pay Groth and Pfeiler for the invoices presented. Motion carried.

Gifford gave an update on the Lake Bed Cleanup. He noted that no projects have been planned at this time but because we will not be filling the lake in the next 30 days or so there’s work that could be done at North beach. Leonard reminded those in attendance that if they know of areas where there’s hazardous debris they should notify the trustees so we can address the issue.

Leonard gave an update on dredging. He said a lot of work has been done evaluating siltation traps. He has asked Bill Holman from Stanley Engineering to quantify the recommended siltation trap located near the Cedars. Some of the questions raised are: How much siltation can we stop? What information can we gather to understand our return on investment? What’s the cost if we do nothing? Will it cost more if we wait? Would the siltation trap help with water quality initiatives? Burger asked if there are companies that provide services to answer these questions. Leonard said he believes so and with Stanley’s help we will be able to locate them. Alternatives such as Iowa State University could assist. Leonard informed the board that the District should endorse a future plan in order to get any type of funding from the state, federal or other funding sources.

A dam construction update was presented by Colgan.   He told those in attendance that the D1 slab which is one of the two major horizontal concrete slabs supporting the labyrinth spillway was completed today. He estimated there were about 75 truckloads of concrete that was poured in a six hour time span. He noted the biggest frustration of getting to this point was that the dam was built on a glacial tilt and get the correct compaction of material during the months of January and February was very difficult. Now that the weather is starting to cooperate, General Constructors has been very active. Iron workers worked over the weekend to get all of the rebar in place so the pour could be done. Several other major pours will be done next week which will allow the spillway to be poured around the 2^nd or 3^rd week in April.   Once the spillway is completed there will still be work to do including removing the cofferdam, backfill work, removing the sheet pile and the earthen dike. He noted that the average flow for this time of year is 400 cfs. Right now it’s 700 cfs. At the flow rate, the lake could be full in two days. A question was raised about debris coming down river once the lake fills. Colgan said debris in the river is a concern due to the lake being empty for almost six years and is somewhat on an unknown at this time but should be manageable. He noted that Lunda was down last week and set up the stop logs. Steve Gehl, who was the Phase 1 construction superintendent from Lunda, said this stop log system is the smoothest he’s ever seen in his experience.

Leonard gave an update regarding water quality. He said he’s been proactively working with the Maquoketa River Watershed Authority, the state legislature and our lobbyists to get a law approved by the Iowa House and Senate that would allow Lake Delhi to be voting member and give us opportunities in the future for state and federal funding. Our lobbyists play an important role in this endeavor and will continue to assist with funding for water quality and siltation programs. There are currently only seven watersheds in the state and by taking the lead now we are years ahead of others before formed. Gifford said this is a hot topic in the State and watersheds will carry a lot of weight to get in getting funding dollars. Gifford also mentioned that he submitted a grant from the Green Community through Rockwell Collins that could potentially cover water-testing expenses.

Leonard informed those in attendance that the next Lake Delhi Voice will be coming out this weekend. He reminded everyone that the next month or so will be your last opportunity to do shore wall work and debris removal. All lake residents need to get their permits for docks and lifts along with making sure their septic systems have been permitted.

Leonard expressed thanks to the board for the plant that was sent to his family at the time of his mother-in-law’s death. He said it was greatly appreciated.

There being no public comments, a motion was made by Burger, second by Gifford to adjourn.

The Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District

Board of Trustees Meeting

Thursday, March 3, 2016 – 6:30 p.m.

Lake Delhi Trustees Administration Office

The meeting of the Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District Board of Trustees was called to order by President Steve Leonard at 6:30 PM at Lake Delhi Trustees Administration Office.

Trustees present: Kramer, Davidson, Leonard by phone, Burger by phone

Trustees absent: Colgan, Gifford, Herman

Visitors: Larry Aschenbrenner, Nancy Hurt, Wanda Davidson

Agenda reviewed by Leonard. Motion was made to approve agenda by Davidson, second by Kramer. Motion carried.

The public hearing for the FY 2016/2017 budget was opened. Kramer gave a short overview of the proposed budget noting that our taxable valuation increased by $11,287,112 from last year. Kramer stated that due to the increased valuation, the tax rate for the lake debt service for FY will decrease from $9.10329 to $7.4775. It was also noted that property tax levied from the $4.00/$1000 will increase from $207,926 for FY16 to $253,065 for FY17 due to the increased valuation. With regard to estimated revenues and expenditures, Kramer stated that as the dam project nears completion we will see a drop in our ending balance in FY17. It was also noted that those numbers are estimates.

Kramer asked for any comments from the board or public. Davidson asked a question regarding the LDRA dredge loan. He wondered why the numbers went from $89,455 in FY15 to $72,107 in FY16 and then back up to $81,292 for FY17. Kramer answered that those numbers came from the dredge debt schedule which had been renegotiated in FYY16. Burger said he reviewed the budget and thought it looked good. Kramer noted that the last two pages of the budget were for the District’s debt service schedule. Those numbers are actual numbers and not estimates. Burger noted that the line item expenditures are estimates and the District could over-expend in one area and under-expend in another. What we can’t do is over-expend the total expenditures without amending the budget. Leonard asked for a motion to close the public hearing. Davidson made the motion, Burger second. Motion catrried.

Burger made motion to adopt a resolution to approve the Fiscal Year budget for 2016/2017, Davidson second. Motion carried.

The next agenda item was consideration and possible action on amending the District’s credit card policy. Kramer explained that the policy had been approved at the February meeting but after giving it to Carla Becker, the County Auditor, she felt we needed to change some of the language. Her concern was the language that gave some leeway to purchases made that would allow for payment of sales tax. She suggested removing that language and adding language that if a purchase was made that included sales tax, the Board of Trustees would need to review and approve before payment could be made. Kramer noted that she had had discussions with Burger and Davidson regarding other aspects of the policy but for the sake of getting the credit card application processed in a timely manner she would like a motion to approved the policy as amended. If we need to add or remove individuals currently named on the credit card policy, we can always amend at a later date. Kramer noted that Davidson felt we should use a purchase order system that isn’t addressed in the policy. Kramer said she agreed that we should look at that but also stressed that the credit card is going to be used minimally and that it was needed most to allow Burrington Group to make purchases for items not available locally that will be used for the start-up and maintenance of the dam. Kramer stated that in order to get the credit card application processed it needed to through the County Supervisors. Davidson asked why that was necessary. Kramer explained that because our finances are held by the County, any credit card application would require their approval. Motion was made by Burger, second by Davidson to approve the amended policy and open for further discussion. Burger said he wanted to make sure that since an important part of the credit card is to buy supplies & equipment for the dam we should have the ability to expand the number of credit card holders to Pat Colgan or those who may either work or volunteer at the dam at a later date. He also said we need to make sure we have control over the credit cards and that is the responsibility of the Treasurer. He said he would support approving the amended policy at this time but we should review to make sure we the right people approved to carry the card and would like to review the policy again at another time. Leonard said he agreed that this policy would probably always need to be looked at and reviewed as our needs continue to evolve but that we do need to get the application processed. Davidson commented that there should be a purchase order for anything ordered using the credit card and that it should be attached with the invoice when it’s presented for approval. With no further discussion, Leonard asked for a vote. Motion carried.

Leonard opened the meeting to public comment. Larry Aschbrenner noted that Sunday, March 13^th would the the 4^th Annual St. Patty’s Day Guest Bartender Event at the Pizza Place. He said he hoped to see as many people from the lake attend and asked that the Trustees send out an email to make people aware that the event was coming up. All tips go to the rebuilding of the dam. The Trustees thanked Larry for his continued support of the Lake.

Motion to adjourn by Davidson, second by Kramer. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:10 pm.

The Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District

Regular Meeting

February 18, 2016

6:30 PM

Lake Delhi Trustees Building

Delhi, IA

The regular meeting of the Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District was called to order by President Steve Leonard at 6:28 PM.

Trustees present: Leonard, Kramer, Davidson, Herman, Colgan (Skype), Gifford (phone), Burger (phone)

Trustees absent: None

Visitors: Larry Peter, Eve Peter, Ed Schmidt, Dan Recker, Pat Dede, Don Dede, Chris Stender, Ron Cook, Marcheta Cooey-Lux, Bill Lux, Nancy Hurt, Dan Reyner, Wayne Garvin, Jenny Garvin, Larry Aschbrenner, Bruce Schneider, Margie Schneider

Recording Secretary: Shelley Kallenbach

Herman motioned to approve the agenda as posted and read, seconded by Davidson. Gifford motioned to move Agenda Item 11 to earlier in the meeting to accommodate his schedule. Herman modified his motion to approve the agenda with Agenda Item 11 to the fourth slot and move the remaining agenda items down accordingly, Davidson seconded, Motion approved.

Davidson motioned to approve the January 21, 2016 meeting minutes, Herman seconded, motion approved.

Davidson motioned to reopen the tabled motion regarding Bruce Schneider’s request for reimbursement for sediment removal from the lakebed, Burger seconded.

Individual trustee opinions regarding the motion were heard.

Davidson stated that he has had the opportunity to look at the sites and documentation. He says that ideally this work would have been approached in a different manner, but the sediment removal was still beneficial to everyone on the lake.

Burger seconded Davidson’s opinion and added that sediment removal improves the safety and recreational value of the lake.

Schneider stated that since the last meeting, he has removed another 50 dump truck loads for about another $3,000 worth of work. Most of the work had been done through the summer and fall and he plans on doing more.

Gifford stated that he did not consider whether or not the work done had value, as there was clear value, but that as the project was begun without trustee involvement it didn’t qualify for review. He stated the only portion that would qualify for reimbursement review would be future work that the Trustees would be involved in.

Herman stated that since the last meeting work has been done with definite value to the general boating and recreational value of the lake. He stated he shared Gifford’s concerns, and also has had lake residents contact him that are concerned about opening a “can of worms” regarding reimbursement. He is concerned that there was no prior Board approval and no solid way to measure what work had been done.

Colgan stated that he didn’t doubt there was value to the work completed, but had concerns about the reimbursement. He stated that if this was approved, many more would come forward. He believes there are still 6 to 12 weeks left to finish the dam and money may be required for contingencies. He feels he needs to be accountable for funding to be available if things happen in the future.

Leonard stated that the original intention with the 80%/20% match was to have Board involvement upfront evaluating ideas on criteria including public recreational benefit, improvement to safety, and cost effectiveness. He stated that it is difficult to understand the starting point and current point since the Board was not formally involved in the process from the beginning. He commended the Schneider family for their work. However, there’s no way to know if the work fits the Board’s criteria. He also commended all of the many property owners who have removed dirt with no reimbursement from the Lake District after the DNR/Corp of Engineers/County Engineer approval process. He stated he would strongly support future work based on recreational value, safety, and cost effectiveness, and would evaluate the work with the same heavy debate the other larger projects have received.

Clarification was requested regarding Colgan’s comments on funding. Colgan stated he is concerned about risk and the Board’s criteria for budget control for reimbursement when the dam itself is not finished.

The original motion on the table was for $25,000 reimbursement for Schneiders’ work that had already been done and still has yet to be done. Votes were taken as follows:

Burger: Yes

Gifford: No

Herman: No

Davidson: Yes

Leonard: No

Kramer: Abstain

Colgan: No

Motion does not pass.

Kramer presented payments for approval. Payments in the amount of $2,577.00 from the General Fund for electricity, internet, printer maintenance, lobbyist, and miscellaneous equipment were presented. Payments in the amount of $423,728.79 for Burrington Group, GCI payment, and Stanley engineering services were presented. Herman motioned to approve the payments as read, seconded by Kramer. Concerns about the increasing costs of engineering expenses were expressed. Colgan reviewed the four Stanley Engineering invoices for the month and their appropriateness. Leonard stated that as the project nears completion, Stanley’s engagement is critical with a lot of moving parts coming together with problem solving and advice. Leonard expressed confidence in the services received and the amount billed. Additionally, a question about whether GCI should pick up some of the contract extension bills due to their failure to meet the deadline in the contract. It was confirmed that over 2 million dollars was saved from the contract rebid, and even with additional charges, there is still a major net money difference saved. Motion passed.

Gifford dropped from the meeting.

Kramer presented the financial reports. The General Fund had revenues of $943.64 and expenses of $2,502.06 to end January at $255,669.18. The Debt Service Fund had revenues of $2,156.24 and no expenditures, ending January at $180,293.24. The Dam/Spillway Project Fund had revenues of $439,076.17 from reimbursements and the county, and expenditures of $660,463.50, ending January at #3,470,670.84. Davidson motioned to file the financial reports as read, seconded by Herman, motion approved.

Motion to request reimbursement from Delaware County in the amount of $194,601.27 for expenses paid by the District was made by Herman, seconded Davidson, motion approved.

Discussion was opened on the issue of a credit card for the District. A maximum spending limit has been set by the County at $3,000. The credit card application would be processed through Grundy National Bank. A set of procedures on the use of this credit card was presented. Herman motioned to approve the presented procedures, Davidson seconded. Discussion was opened. Herman added an exception for smaller online purchases in which the tax-exempt paperwork would take more time than it is worth. Stamped inventory and a purchasing log was also discussed. Herman amended his motion to allow purchases of less than $50 total online be exempt from the tax-exempt status if it creates a hardship in regards to placing an order, Davidson seconded, motion approved.

Colgan reviewed GCI Change Order #8 in the amount of $6,683.25. This was presented at the previous meeting but had not yet been adequately reviewed by Stanley Engineering. This change order allows for equipment that would allow the SCADA computer to be located in the LDRA house across the river which has better environment to house this type of equipment computer to the dampness of the concrete powerhouse structure. Burger motioned to approve GCI Change Order #8, Kramer seconded, motion approved.

Colgan presented updates regarding job descriptions for potential future employees of the lake. Colgan states that the District will not be hiring any contractors as direct employees to operate the dam. Personal that will operate the dam that are non-volunteer workers would be hired and managed by Burrington Group. All maintenance work would be a separate contract with Lunda for one to two years.

The potential endorsement of HF2249 by the District was discussed. Leonard stated that a very concerted approach was made regarding getting financial support for Lake Delhi and future watershed management concerns. As this is a growing statewide issue, increased funding is becoming available through the state. However, Iowa requires that only counties and cities are able to be voting members of watershed management authorities.  Our combined District is currently not eligible. HF2249 is a bill currently in place to allow the District to be a voting member of this future watershed management authority. The bill has already passed the committee process. Davidson motioned to formally endorse HF2249 as a District, Kramer seconded. It is unknown at this time what liabilities the District may incur in the future as part of this authority, but each will be reviewed extensively. Motion to endorse HF2249 approved.

The Board heard committee updates.

The Lake Bed Cleanup Committee had no updates.

The Dredge Committee should know the final Lidar mapping from Stanley on the last remaining borings and will forward the data as soon as it is received.

The Dam Construction Committee states that GCI has worked every day except for three or four due to wind chill. Six to eight weeks remain to finish the dam under ideal weather conditions, with parts remaining including a sheet pile wall to prevent water from running around the dam spillway. The downstream side is complete. The weather has been impacting the compaction of clay materials that will be the base for three remaining concrete slabs on grade. Warmer weather, wind, and potentially mixing the clay with lime will allow for drier clay and subsequent slab placement.

The Funding and Finance Committee stated there will be a public hearing March 3^rd to review the next fiscal year budget.

Leonard added that within the last week he met with the Iowa DNR and various state representatives in Des Moines for an update on the lake restoration progress and the request to get on the Iowa Public Lakes list. This could allow for increased funding for the lake. There was good communication and support following the meeting.

Public discussion was opened.

Bruce Schneider stated that he feels he was let down by the Board because he was not told to get a bid. Leonard clarified that there were no details on the work done or the estimated cost until the last meeting. Leonard stated that the Board had taken the time to evaluate the cost effectiveness, safety, and risk management of each project proposal on its individual merits, and would continue to do so for any future work, including work performed by Schneider. He stated that with all proposals, the Board had gone through a yes or no process of voting for each project individually. Leonard stated that he is willing to add future work with the Schneiders on the March 3^rd meeting agenda if the Schneiders are willing to propose new work. Assuming the board is in agreement with new work, he would contact Randy Rattenborg to come out to complete laser lines for work estimation prior to the work starting.

Larry Peter expressed concerns about matching funds required in a watershed authority regarding property tax increases. It was clarified that any situation where matching funds would require a property tax increase would have to go to the voters. If the general operating funds would be used for matching funding, the Board would make the decision to use or not use it.

A question was raised on if the District would be paying rent to the LDRA for use of the LDRA building for the remote computer access. It was clarified that the District owns the LDRA building.

It was clarified that no liaison is required to be a part of the legislative watershed authority, as the request is for the Board to have a single vote.

A question regarding the location of archaeological sites was raised. It was confirmed that the Board is unaware of any archaeological disturbances, but is bound by the Corps of Engineers not to release the archaeological site locations publicly. However, the Board continues to be mindful of them.

With regard to the 80%/20% projects, it was confirmed that each project had been done differently for silt removal along with being reviewed by the Board under its own individual merits. 100% payment by the road associations had been expected prior to Board reimbursement. A laser requirement will be reviewed on March 3^rd as a formal process. Schneider’s future work would be considered but not automatically approved.

Davidson motioned to adjourn, seconded by Herman. Meeting adjourned at 8:25 PM.

The Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District

Regular Meeting

Thursday, January 21, 2016

6:30 PM

Lake Delhi Trustees Administration Building

Delhi, IA

The regular meeting of the Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District was called to order by President Steve Leonard at 6:30 pm.

Trustees present: Leonard, Gifford, Burger, Kramer, Davidson, Herman, Colgan (via Skype)

Trustees absent: None

Recording secretary: Shelley Kallenbach

Visitors: Larry Peter, Eve Peter, Donald Dede, Becky Willey, Jim Willey, Ed Schmidt, Margie Schneider, Bruce Schneider, Randy Rattenborg, Jason Wenger, Dave Larson, Ben Pasker, Bill Lux, Marcheta Lux

Motion to approve the agenda as posted made by Davidson, seconded by Burger, motion approved.

Motion to approve the December 17, 2015 meeting minutes made by Burger, seconded by Gifford, motion approved.

Kramer presented payments for approval. Payments in the amount of $2,672.26 for electricity, printer maintenance, warrants, lobbyist, salt and sand, and internet were presented from the General Fund. Payments in the amount of $660,463.50

for dam operations, Phase 2 and Phase 1 payments, and engineering services were presented from the Dam/Spillway Project Fund. Motion to approve payments as read was made by Burger, seconded by Gifford, motion approved.

Kramer read the financial reports through December 31, 2015. The General Fund had revenues of $4,814.86 from the county and interest, and expenditures of $3,568.38 from approved miscellaneous payments, ending December at $257,397.70. The Debt Service Fund had revenues of $6,539.62 from the county and interest, and no expenditures, ending December at $178,137.00. The Dam/Spillway Project Fund had revenues of $1,245,412.59 from county, community fund, and LDRA revenues, and expenditures of $445,412.45 for Phase 2, engineering, and contracted services, ending December at $3,692,058.17. Motion to receive and file the financial reports made by Burger, seconded by Herman, motion approved.

Motion to request reimbursement in the amount of $299,681.95 from Delaware County made by Herman, seconded by Gifford, motion approved.

Motion to request reimbursement in the amount of $350,530.55 from the Community Fund to Rebuild Lake Delhi made by Davidson, seconded by Gifford. The Community Fund will have approximately $60,000 left in it after this requested draw. Motion approved.

Motion to approve Thursday, March 3^rd at the Administrative Building at 6:30 PM for a public hearing to approve the FY 2016/2017 budget was made by Burger, seconded by Gifford, motion approved.

The Board considered possible action on a proposal from Dubuque Fire Equipment for equipment needed for dam operations. Dubuque Fire Equipment was recommended to assist with finding necessary fire protection equipment for the dam. A walkthrough was conducted, and DFE provided an itemization of what is needed and pricing. Their recommendation for equipment came to a cost of $2,614.00. Colgan advised that he believed this was an appropriate recommendation. Motion to approve the proposal from DFE as read made by Herman, seconded by Burger. The proposal does not include regular maintenance, which is a nominal fee. Motion approved.

Motion to table discussion on a possible credit card for operational purposes until an example policy can be obtained made by Burger, seconded by Gifford, motion approved.

Change Order #7 was canceled. Colgan presented GCI Change Order #8. which is the equipment required to allow the SCADA computer to be installed in the LDRA building across the river from the concrete powerhouse. The control room where the computer was to be placed has environmental problems including high humidity. An alternative location was recommended to eliminate the need to make major modifications to the control room to improve the environment. Part of the benefit of the SCADA system is to allow JetCo to remotely reprogramming of the PLC. Change Order #8 is for the purchase and placement of this equipment to allow the SCADA computer to be located across the river in the LDRA building. Kramer motioned to table discussion on Change Order #8 until further information is obtained, seconded by Herman, motion approved.

The Board discussed the need for a job description for paid contractors and dam volunteers. The operating plan has the dam operations automated 85% of the time with daily inspections made by volunteers. However, for the other 15%, trained operators would be needed during gate movement, etc. This group of people would also be responsible for upkeep, maintenance, buoys, etc. A meeting with Burrington Group is scheduled to discuss this subject. Motion to table discussion on a job description made by Burger, seconded by Davidson. It was emphasized that it is important to clarify the job responsibilities of a contractor versus an employee for legal purposes. Motion to table approved.

The Board heard Bruce Schneider’s proposal for reimbursement for sediment removal from the lakebed. Schneider presented a letter detailing his proposal. His first proposal had been for an 80% cost share for $25,680 for the 6,420 cubic yards of material he has removed since 2014. Since this proposal was made in October of 2015, he has removed an additional 2,938 cubic yards of sediment at an estimated cost of $14,700. He proposes a reimbursement of $25,000, with the remainder and any further work donated by himself, to cover fuel and machinery costs.

Burger motioned to approve a $25,000 reimbursement to Schneider for this and future dredging, seconded by Davidson.

Discussion was opened on the proposal. The sediment location removal was originally driven by the search for black dirt for the Schneider family farm, and it removed approximately 75 to 100 feet out toward the lakebed to create about 6 feet deep of water near Schmidt’s cove. Concerns about the recreational value of this dredging were raised. The benefit of sediment removal for future dredging requirements was reiterated. Concerns about opening up reimbursements for dredging work completed in 2014 or earlier by private individuals was raised, as well as concerns about reimbursement for work that may or may not happen. The original state of dredging with the October proposal was visited and seen by Leonard, Herman, and Davidson, but the additional work has not been seen.

A roll call of concerns to be addressed prior to approval was made.

Leonard commented that he appreciated Bruce removing dirt and silt from the Lake for the potential benefit of many.   He stated he wanted to look at the updated work prior to making a recommendation, as well as the goals and plans for going forward. He stated that he wished they had brought a plan to the board before doing any work as it is difficult to understand what specific benefits there is to this proposed reimbursement project. Reminding everyone that safety, public recreational benefit, and cost effectiveness needs to be considered and the only way to do that was to have the board involved since inception. He wants to do his due diligence to see the benefits to the lake prior committing anything to be fiscally responsible to taxpayers.

The Schneiders’ commented that they don’t expect to keep working for free without having an agreement in place to get paid.   Leonard said that anything going forward should be agreed to by the District board with all appropriate District criteria considered if reimbursement is to be requested.

Colgan says there is a benefit to the sediment removal and the amount requested is fair, but wants to see more detail prior to approval.

Kramer agreed with Colgan that removal of sediment is a benefit to the lake but expressed concern that there was no Trustee oversight on this project.

Gifford explained that he is having difficulty determining what the value of what Schneider did because he does not know the before and after depths, or dimensions of the area where sediment was removed.

Gifford wants to know how deep it was in this location prior to sediment removal, and how deep it is now.  He also asked if any sand was removed besides the black direct.  Schneider responded that he didn’t take the sand because it had no value.

Gifford then asked Schneider if his project was profitable and beneficial, explaining he is assuming it was or why would Schneider proceed with it.  Schneider responded that it was profitable and beneficial to him.

“Herman indicated a desire to be able to explain, in detail, to anyone that asked the reasons that the Board approved a cost share on any given project.  In order to do so, Herman wanted to have a quantification of material to be removed or that has been removed, especially if the Board were to consider the approval of a prior removal from 2014.  Herman also indicated that the use of prior and subsequent LIDAR data would be beneficial.”

Motion to table the motion made by Burger was made by Herman to allow board members to take a closer look, seconded by Gifford. Votes tabled as follows:

Leonard: Yay

Gifford: Yay

Kramer: Yay

Herman: Yay

Burger: Nay, because he feels it is time to approve this particular request.

Davidson: Nay, because he feels that this is an incredible deal.

Motion approved; discussion on a possible Schneider reimbursement tabled until the February meeting.

The Board heard committee updates.

The Lake Bed Cleanup Committee had no updates.

The Dredge Committee will be having a work session soon to work on the going-forward strategy for dredging and a vision for sediment maintenance.

The Dam Construction Committee says that GCI has stuck with it every day in January that work was possible. Next week work will be to construct one of the inclined slabs on grade and will include placing the granular fill, installing rebar, and concrete pouring on Thursday or Friday of next week. He applauds GCI for working through tough situations and not asking for additional funds.

The Water Quality Committee is tackling many water quality issues and also pursuing a Rockwell grant. Work on these water quality issue will be discussed at the upcoming planning meeting.

The Funding/Finance Committee had no updates. Burger complimented Kramer on her solid work on the presented budget.

Herman updated the Board that he has received a petition for a declaratory judgment as discussed in previous meetings and is working on filling in the blanks. He is also working on a FEMA quarterly report.

There was no public comment.

Davidson motioned to adjourn, seconded by Gifford. The meeting adjourned at 8:21 pm.

The Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District Board of Trustees

Regular Meeting

Thursday, December 17, 2015

6:30 PM

Lake Delhi Administration Building

Delhi, IA

The regular meeting of the Combined Lake Delhi Recreational Facility and Water Quality District Board of Trustees was called to order by President Steve Leonard at 6:35 PM.

Trustees present: Leonard, Gifford, Burger, Kramer, Herman, Colgan, and Davidson (arrived later)

Trustees absent: None

Recording secretary: Shelley Kallenbach

Visitors present: Larry Peter, Eve Peter, Pat Dede, Don Dede, Sara Millhouse, Dave Larson, Chloe Colgan, Brock Lorren, Chip Hughs, Jim Locke, Ben Pasker, Randy Rattenborg, Larry Aschbrenner, Marcheta Cooey-Lux

Motion to approve the agenda as read with the addition of consideration and possible action on GCI Change Order #2 was made by Colgan, seconded by Gifford, motion approved.

Motion to approve the November 19, 2015 meeting minutes as posted made by Burger, seconded by Herman, motion approved.

Kramer presented payments for approval. Claims in the amount of $3,090.97 from the General Fund for electricity, maintenance, clerical services, lobbyist services, printer cartridges, and furnace inspection were presented. Claims in the amount of $445,889.76 for powerhouse painting, dam operations, Phase 2 payment, engineering services, and diesel fuel were made from the Dam/Spillway Project Fund. Motion to approve payments as read was made by Herman, seconded by Gifford, motion approved.

Motion to approve a request to Delaware County for reimbursement for invoices paid by the District for the spillway rebuild in the amount of $218,267.27 was made by Herman, seconded by Burger, motion approved.

Motion to approve a request to the Community Fund to Rebuild Lake Delhi for reimbursement for invoices paid by the District for the dam rebuild in the amount of $218,738.43 was made by Burger, seconded by Gifford, motion approved.

Kramer presented the financial reports. The General Fund had revenues of $4,186.43 from Delaware County, and expenditures of $2,506.13 for miscellaneous expenses, ending the month at $256,151.22. The Debt Service Fund had revenues of $9,575.53 from Delaware County and expenditures of $115,323.75 for an interest payment, ending the month at $171,597.38. The Dam/Spillway Project Fund had revenues of $2,504.12 from interest and expenditures of $533,654.10 for Phase 1, Phase 2, and engineering payments, ending the month at $2,892,058.03.

Leonard and Kramer presented a high-level projected budget summary for the dam reconstruction. The projected budget estimates the total cost, including all planned and foreseen costs, at approximately $15,861,393, and total funding for the project estimated at $16,451,400.10. Therefore, barring significant additional unforeseen expenditures, the dam should be rebuilt with an excess of funding of approximately $590,007.10 remaining.

Motion to file the financial reports and projected budget summary as presented was made by Colgan, seconded by Herman, motion approved.

The Board considered possible action on Stanley Supplemental Agreement #34. This supplemental agreement had been made months ago for Stanley to evaluate dredging and siltation trap options in the amount of $17,100. However, formal approval of the supplemental agreement was not made, though the work is complete and paid for. Motion to formally approve Stanley Supplemental Agreement #34 was made by Herman, seconded by Kramer, motion approved.

The Board considered possible action on Stanley Supplemental Agreement #39 in the amount of $90,000. This is to extend the time for the Stanley contractor to work on site to monitor day-to-day operations and answer technical questions, as well as office work and Stanley negotiation with contractors regarding change orders. The extension would be through February 1^st, 2016, and is necessary due to the construction delay after the June cofferdam breach. Burger motioned to approve Stanley Supplemental Agreement #39, Kramer seconded. It was confirmed that the Board’s contract with GCI does not place this cost on GCI for delays attributed to them, though it was a major point of discussion in the rebid for Phase 2, but that this will be the only cost to the Board for the delay in comparison to GCI’s significant costs. Motion approved.

The Board considered possible action on GCI Change Orders #2 through #6.

GCI Change Order #2 is related to the decision to reuse the gate actuators in the current project. This presented a significant cost savings. However, the actuators’ electricity wiring needed to be updated to allow GCI to work with them. This updated change order is in the amount of $9,000. Herman motioned to approve, Burger seconded, motion approved.

GCI Change Order #3 is for work completed on the upstream buttress. As the wing wall was not on bedrock, the wing wall had to be sealed beneath the footing to prevent water from seeping into the upstream buttress. With Stanley’s negotiation, this change order is in the amount of $39,000. Kramer motioned to approve, Herman seconded, motion approved.

GCI Change Order #4 completed the same work as Change Order #3, only on the downstream buttress. With Stanley’s negotiation, Change Order #4 is in the amount of $9,000. Herman motioned to approve, Burger seconded, motion approved.

GCI Change Order #5 is in reference to work that was required following the June cofferdam failure. A clay core wall was required to be placed on the river floor to reinforce the cofferdam, which therefore doubled the amount of earthen material necessary to remove. This resulted in a unit price adjustment based on the amount of material removed, as well as testing for the new levels of clay that were not previously mapped by the 2011 borings. This change order is in the amount of $79,000, and the Board is contractually obligated to this cost. Herman motioned to approve Change Order #5, Kramer seconded, motion approved.

GCI Change Order #6 currently has no cost impact to the Board. Additional concrete costs are shared 50/50 between GCI and the Board up to the end of the year. The delay due to the June cofferdam breach has extended the timeframe for concrete pours. However, since the weather has so far been warm, there have been no additional costs to share. If there are costs before December 31^st, those costs will be shared 50/50. Burger motioned to approve, Gifford seconded, motion approved.

The Board received and filed proposals for painting the powerhouse. The Board sought proposals for salt blast cleaning and repainting the powerhouse to allow for installation of cabinetry, electronics, etc. The Board received two bids, including one from Pospisil Painting for $27,410, and one from Allen’s Painting for $3,400. The Trustees have a resolution allowing the Board President and Treasurer to approve expenditures up to $5,000 before Board approval, and so the Allen Painting bid was selected and used. The powerhouse has now been saltblasted and painted. Burger motioned to receive and file the bids from Allen’s Painting and Pospisil Painting, and to approve the Allen’s Painting bid, Gifford seconded, motion approved.

The Board considered establishing credit accounts with Delhi Lumber, Palmer Hardware, and Norby’s Farm and Fleet for small purchases necessary for dam operations. A need was expressed for accounts to allow for purchases of miscellaneous items such as snowblowers, salt, etc. necessary for operators to use on the dam on short notice. Burger motioned to establish credit accounts with Delhi Lumber, Palmer Hardware, and Norby’s Farm and Fleet with a limit of up to $500 per purchase with a list of all authorized chargers and to require signoff for purchase from a trustee, Davidson seconded, motion approved.

The Board discussed the need to consider a credit card account for operational purposes. The Board may need to purchase larger items or items that cannot be found locally for dam operations, so a credit card would be useful. It was agreed that this would be a good idea and that options should be considered. Herman motioned to table action on a credit card until the January meeting, Burger seconded, motion approved.

The Board considered possible action on a small committee to investigate the transition of the Maquoketa River Water Quality Team’s mission and duties to the Board. Over recent years, the Maquoketa River Water Quality Team (MRWQT) has been overseeing water quality, including septic maintenance, erosion control, bacteria testing, and public information. The MRWQT is seeking to transfer these responsibilities over to the Board along with remaining funds earmarked to be used for encouraging people to maintain water quality. It was discussed that water quality is a very large issue with many subsections, and a small committee is needed to determine these subsections and begin the process of focusing and researching water quality for Board recommendations on an action plan. Disappointment on the loss of knowledgeable voices from the MRWQT was expressed. Herman motioned to create a small committee with not to exceed 3 trustees and not to exceed 3 volunteer members of the public if available to create recommendations and thoughts on how the Board should proceed from a water quality standpoint, Gifford seconded, motion approved. Interested trustee members were solicited. Leonard, Gifford, and Davidson expressed interest in participation.

The Board heard committee updates.

Leonard presented updates from the Water Quality committee. The Board was represented at meetings for a large Watershed Management Authority encompassing Maquoketa River stakeholders. The Board was instrumental in beginning this process. It is seeking an agreement between political subdivisions to assess water quality and flood risk, develop partnerships and leverage resources. 28 participants were present at the meeting, including counties, conservation departments, the NRCS, and others. They are seeking to draft a 28E agreement to commit to water quality importance, especially in light of recent legal actions taken in Des Moines against authorities for water quality-related complaints. More will be coming in the next month or two.

The Lake Bed Cleanup committee stated that a significant amount of debris was lost following heavy rains the past week. This was a big plus for the lake.

The Dredging Committee is seeking ways to stop siltation from getting downstream into the lake, and a great way to do that would be to have a siltation trap near the dredge disposal site as recommended by Stanley Engineering. The Committee has found a firm in Iowa to give an estimate for such a project at $1.8 to $2 million in a 20-acre area.  A final amount would be determined by the board going out to bid.  If this is deemed to be an important project by the board, we will need to continue to raise money.  Fund raising will be critical to the success of a sedimentation trap.

The Dam Construction Committee presented updates. A major flood occurred this past week, including 3 inches of rain last Sunday. The flow rose to 4200 cfs. The flood gates had been in a position to protect the downstream cofferdam, but with the rain, it became necessary to protect the entire site from flooding upstream. The contractors were given enough time to remove their equipment successfully downstream before the gates were opened to release the water. The downstream cofferdam was lost, but it would not have been needed within a week anyway. The workers were back to work by Tuesday working on the top portion of the dam. Only one day was lost. Remaining work includes 3 slabs on grade, 3 wall pours, and the labyrinth spillway.

The Funding/Finance Committee and Legislative Committee had no updates.

The floor was opened for public comment.

Confusion about change orders was expressed. It was explained that the original contract with GCI was for $6.1 million, and change orders cover changes to the contract due to site conditions. The plan and the costs will come out very close.

It was expressed that when considering dredge costs, the cost to remove material is often overlooked.

It was stated that in 13 days, the DNR goes to the appropriations committee to ask for watershed area funding, but Lake Delhi doesn’t qualify due to the ratios used to meet the criteria. It was asked how to change criteria to increase funding. The Board stated that this is not the sole determiner of yearly funding, and also that the creation of this watershed authority may impact funding opportunities in the future.

Burger motioned to adjourn, Herman seconded, meeting adjourned at 8:30 PM.